| 25A245 |
Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice |
Wisconsin |
2025-08-29 |
Presumed Complete |
|
domestic-violence expungement federal-statute firearm-possession misdemeanor-conviction restoration-of-rights |
Whether an expungement must, under state law, completely negate a conviction in order to count as an expungement under 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(B)(ii). |
| 25-5339 |
David Keith Nutter v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-08-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law firearm-regulation historical-analogues misdemeanor-conviction second-amendment |
1. Whether § 922(g)(9) runs afoul of the Second Amendment, facially and as-applied, where (a) ambiguous historical regulation of generalized "dangerou… |
| 25-5303 |
Jae Michael Bernard v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-08-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
firearm-prohibition gun-rights historical-tradition misdemeanor-conviction second-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Whether a permanent lifetime prohibition for a misdemeanor conviction, which was adopted by Congress in 1994 and codified in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) and… |
| 21-5432 |
Deangelo Lenard Johnson v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-law criminal-statute domestic-violence firearm-possession firearms knowledge-of-status mens-rea misdemeanor-conviction rehaif-standard rehaif-v-united-states statutory-interpretation |
Whether, to support Rehaif's knowledge-of-status element in a prosecution for unlawful possession of a firearm by a person convicted of a misdemeanor … |
| 20-782 |
Raymond Holloway, Jr. v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-12-08 |
Denied |
Amici (5) |
2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-law due-process firearms-prohibition gun-ownership individual-liberty misdemeanor-conviction second-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Does a lifetime firearms prohibition based on a nonviolent misdemeanor conviction violate the Second Amendment? |
| 19-7878 |
Joseph Ramon Santillan v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-03-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conviction-classification criminal-law criminal-sentencing drug-offense drug-offenses due-process equal-protection federal-sentencing felony-conviction mandatory-minimum misdemeanor-conviction sentencing sentencing-enhancement state-federal-interaction state-federal-law statutory-interpretation |
Did defendant's State of California marijuana conviction constitute a "prior conviction for a felony drug offense," increasing defendant's mandatory m… |
| 19-7869 |
Raymond David Wilson v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-03-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
career-offender common-scheme criminal-scheme criminal-sentencing felony-disposition judicial-discretion misdemeanor-conviction misrepresentation-of-felony prior-conviction prior-convictions sentencing sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Why Did The DiStRiCt CouRt ERRONeouSLY
CLASSIFEd MR.WiLSON AS A CAREER OFFENdER WhEN IN FACT BOth PRiORS
AN INtERVeNiNg ARRESt.
LSO WAS The DiStRICt C… |
| 19-7758 |
Lin Ouyang v. Achem Industry America, Inc. |
California |
2020-02-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment appeal civil-procedure civil-rights court-appointed-counsel criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection equal-protection-clause fourth-amendment indigent-defendant indigent-rights misdemeanor-conviction right-to-counsel |
Whether the state court's dismissal of the appeal from misdemeanor conviction, despite the lack of assistance of counsel on appeal, violates the Equal… |
| 19-6487 |
Sean M. Donahue v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
2019-11-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-921a20b 18-usc-922g1 civil-rights civil-rights-restoration constitutional-infirmity cumulative due-process firearms-disabilities firearms-disability jurisdictional-authority misdemeanor-conviction pennsylvania restoration-of-rights second-amendment statutory-interpretation |
DOES TREATING "CIVIL RIGHTS " AS CUMULATIVE RENDER THE
ENFORCEMENT OF 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(l) AND 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20)(B) TO BE
CONSTITUTIONALLY INFIRM … |