No. 19-7758
Lin Ouyang v. Achem Industry America, Inc.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appeal civil-procedure civil-rights court-appointed-counsel criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection equal-protection-clause fourth-amendment indigent-defendant indigent-rights misdemeanor-conviction right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the state court's dismissal of the appeal from misdemeanor conviction, despite the lack of assistance of counsel on appeal, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Whether California enforcement of judgments law (California Code of Civil Procedures sections 680.101 through 724.260) is consistent with due process.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state court's dismissal of the appeal from misdemeanor conviction, despite the lack of assistance of counsel on appeal, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-19
Waiver of right of respondent Achem Industry American, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2020)
2019-10-01
Application (19A360) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 10, 2019 to February 8, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2019-10-01
Application (19A360) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 8, 2020.
Attorneys
Achem Industry American, Inc.
Ray Hsu — Law Offices of Ray Hsu & Associates, P.C., Respondent
Lin Ouyang
Lin Ouyang — Petitioner