No. 19-7869
Raymond David Wilson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender common-scheme criminal-scheme criminal-sentencing felony-disposition judicial-discretion misdemeanor-conviction misrepresentation-of-felony prior-conviction prior-convictions sentencing sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Why Did The DiStRiCt CouRt ERRONeouSLY
CLASSIFEd MR.WiLSON AS A CAREER OFFENdER WhEN IN FACT BOth PRiORS
AN INtERVeNiNg ARRESt.
LSO WAS The DiStRICt COURt WRONg FOR LEtTiNg MR.WiLSON MiSpRISON OF A
eLONy Be USE FOR thE CAREER OFFENdER PURPOSE WhEN iN FACT MiSPRiSON
F A FeloNy is Simple Neglect ChARge...
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Why Did The District Court Erroneously Classify Mr. Wilson As A Career Offender
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2020)
2019-12-12
Application (19A655) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 1, 2020.
2019-11-25
Application (19A655) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 3, 2019 to February 1, 2020, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Raymond David Wilson
Raymond David Wilson — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent