DOES TREATING "CIVIL RIGHTS " AS CUMULATIVE RENDER THE
ENFORCEMENT OF 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(l) AND 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20)(B) TO BE
CONSTITUTIONALLY INFIRM WITHIN PENNSYLVANIA?

IN A CASE IN WHICH AN APPELLANT WHO HAS BEEN CONVICTED
OF A FIRST DEGREE MISDEMEANOR IN PENNSYLVANIA DOES NOT
STIPULATE TO THE MEANING OF "HAS HAD CIVIL RIGHTS RESTORED "
REFERRING EXPLICITLY TO, AND ONLY, TO "THE RIGHT TO VOTE, THE
RIGHT TO SEEK AND HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE AND THE RIGHT TO SERVE ON
A JURY ', DO PENNSYLVANIA TRIAL COURTS HAVE THE AUTHORITY AND
JURISDICTION NECESSARY TO RESTORE ENOUGH "CIVIL RIGHTS " TO
EFFECTUATE THE REMOVAL OF A FIREARMS DISABILITY UNDER 18 U.S.C.
§922(g)(l) AND 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20)(B)?

ARE MISDEMEANANTS IN PENNSYLVANIA EXEMPT FROM FIREARMS
DISABILITIES UNDER 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(l) AND 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20)(B) WITH
REGARD TO FIREARMS THAT WERE POSSESSED OR OWNED PRIOR TO AN
INDIVIDUAL INCURRING A FIRST DEGREE MISDEMEANOR CONVICTION
IN PENNSYLVANIA AND ALSO WITH REGARD TO FIREARMS
MANUFACTURED WITHIN THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA OR FIREARMS
ASSEMBLED IN PENNSYLVANIA, IN WHICH THE 'CONTROLLED PARTS ' ARE
MANUFACTURED WITHIN PENNSYLVANIA.

Does treating 'civil rights' as cumulative render the enforcement of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) and 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20)(B) to be constitutionally infirm within Pennsylvania?