No. 21-8248
Lorenzo Newborn, Karl Darnell Holmes, and Herbert McClain v. California
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appointed-counsel court-appointment criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process in-forma-pauperis indigent-defendant indigent-status right-to-counsel supreme-court-rule writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner should be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis
Docket Entries
2022-11-03
Record returned to the Supreme Court of California (6 boxes).
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-05
Record received from the Supreme Court of California (6 boxes).
2022-09-22
Record Requested.
2022-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-08-26
Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
2022-07-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 29, 2022. See Rule 30.1.
2022-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 28, 2022 to August 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-06-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 28, 2022)
Attorneys
California
Lorenzo Newborn, et al.
Eric Stephen Multhaup — Law Offices of Eric Multhaup, Petitioner