No. 19-8052
Mohamed A. Almahmmody v. Tennessee
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: the legal issue being raised appears to be: appeal court-appointed-counsel criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process in-forma-pauperis indigency indigent-defendant pro-bono-representation right-to-counsel transcript trial-transcript
Latest Conference:
2020-05-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the state court failed to appoint counsel for his appeal despite finding him indigent
Docket Entries
2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-17
Waiver of right of respondent Tennessee to respond filed.
2020-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Mohamed Almahmmody
Mark Christopher Scruggs — Johnson, Scruggs & Barfield, Petitioner
Tennessee
Clark B. Thornton — Office of the Attorney General & Reporter, Respondent