Donald Alexander Spice v. Michigan
QUESTION I
WHETHER ICR S.433(C) <3) IS UNCONSTTIOTTONAL AS IT VIOLATES THE EQUAL PROTECTION
M© DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OP THE FOURTEENTH AMENDME3ST AND THE MANDATES OF THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, REQUIRING STATES TO FURNISH TRANSCRIPTS TO
INDIGEST DEFENDANTS FOR USE ON APPEAL, UPON REQUEST?
QUESTION II
WHETHER TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING SPICE ACCESS TO THE
TRANSCRIPTS, WHEN SPICE SHOWED GOOD CAUSE?
QUESTION III
WHETHER SPICE WAS DENIED ACCESS TO THE COURTS GUARANTEED BY THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION UNDER THE FIRST A3® FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, BY ACTIONS OF THE '
iCCGHGAN EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT?
Whether MOR 5.433(c)(3) is unconstitutional as it violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the mandates of the United States Supreme Court, requiring states to furnish transcripts to indigent defendants for use on appeal, upon request?