No. 19-8300
Tags: barker-framework barker-v-wingo constitutional-rights criminal-appeal criminal-appeals due-process fairness-and-prejudice indigent-counsel indigent-defendant speedy-trial
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the delay in Petitioner's first appeal as of right from his criminal conviction violate the Due Process Clause?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the delay in Petitioner's first appeal as of right from his criminal conviction violate the Due Process Clause?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-27
Reply of petitioner Clark Milton Hyden filed. (Distributed)
2020-08-14
Brief of respondent Georgia in opposition filed.
2020-07-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 14, 2020.
2020-06-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 15, 2020 to August 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-06-15
Response Requested. (Due July 15, 2020)
2020-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Clark Milton Hyden
Georgia
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Respondent