I.
The Sixth Circuit conmitted plain error, contrary to Buck v. Davis,
137 S.Ct. 759 (2017) and Miller-E1 v.
v
Cockre11, 537 U.S. 322 (2003).
because it did not have jurisdiction to consider the merit of Canpbell's appeal fron the district court's ruling on his habeas petition
without issuing a certificate of appealability first.

II.
Whether reasonable jurist could debate the District. Court's procedural
holding that Canpbell had not net. the burden .to trigger a later start
date of.the statute of limitation under 28 U.S.C. S 2244(d)(1)(D)?

Whether the Sixth Circuit committed plain error in considering the merits of Campbell's appeal without issuing a certificate of appealability first