No. 19-6543
Peter Gakuba v. Michelle Neese
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-conviction due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing structural-error structural-errors
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the state court's denial of habeas corpus relief, involving issues of due-process, equal-protection, ineffective-assistance-of-counsel, and structural-errors
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent Michelle Neese to respond filed.
2019-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Michelle Neese
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Peter Gakuba
Peter Gakuba — Petitioner