I.
WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT OPINION IN AFFIRMING
THE NEBRASKA LOWER COURT'S JUDGMENT DENYING PETITIONER THE SIXTH
AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PROCEED PRO SE, OWNHISSOWN, AS COUNSEL OF
CHOICE,,WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY INFIRMED AND PREJUDICIAL.

II.
WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT OPINION IN AFFIRMING
THE NEBRASKA LOWER COURT'S JUDGMENT DENYING PETITIONER'S DEFENSE
COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW BASED UPON DISAGREEMENTS AND CONFLICTS
OF INTERESTS ENGENDERED BY DEFENSE COUNSEL AND PETITIONER,
CONSTITUTED AN CONSTITUTIONAL INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE
PETITEETITlONER'S FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION.

III.
WHETHER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AND PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO COUNSEL
OF CHOICE WAS VIOLATED WHEN THE LOWER DISTRICT COURT VIA ITS
ORDER DENIED CRIMINAL DEFENDANT HIS RIGHT TO SELF-REPRESENTATION
(PRO SE), IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SIMULTANEOUSLY ADJUDICATION WITH
DENYING CRIMINAL DEFENDANT'S DEFENSE COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW
FROM REPRESENTATION THEREOF.

Whether the Nebraska Supreme Court's denial of the petitioner's right to proceed pro se violated the Sixth Amendment