The State's Court of last resort decided an important Federal Question in a way that conflicts with the right to counsel in a criminal case, where (a) The State's identification is suggestive (b) Unreliable (c) a violation of Due Process (d) written State and Dicta on extent ten Federal law in a way that conflicts with This Court's precedent.

The jury Certiorari decides That the essential Elements of CFE EZE Not Proven, (G) "The Judge Should," in This Case We

(L) Whether "That State Court Decided a Decision on a Federal Question in a way That Conflicts with This Court's Decision whether (a) Comparative PFE such OF Prosecutorial is unduly, (b) Combined Improper Counsel Deprived tion is Set 00S Ci Ae FeAl end $$

Whether the state court decided a federal question in a way that conflicts with this Court's precedent on the right to counsel and due process