No. 19-6449
Antwoine Marquise Bealer v. Kern Valley State Prison
IFP
Tags: 8th-amendment administrative-decision administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-screening PLRA prison prisoner-rights standing
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
DOES THE PLRA REQUIRE THE COURT TO
LOOK BEYOND AN PRIMA FACIE SHOWING
WHEN SCREENING PRISONER IN FORMA
PAUPERIS COMPLAINTS.
DOES DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROTECTIONS
APPLY TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS
BY PRISON OFFICIALS TO SEGREGATE
INMATES.
DOES CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT
APPLY STRICTLY TO HEALTH AND SAFETY.
DID THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSE ITS
DISCRETION BY REQUIRING THAT MORE
FACT BE RAISED FOR A REASONABLE
EXPECTATION THAT DISCOVERY WILL
REVEAL EVIDENCE OF PLEADED
CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the PLRA require the court to look beyond a prima facie showing when screening prisoner in forma pauperis complaints?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
2019-06-19
Application (18A1341) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 23, 2019.
2019-06-10
Application (18A1341) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 24, 2019 to August 23, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Antwoine M. Bealer
Antwoine Marquise Bealer — Petitioner