No. 19-6472

Arthur Lopez v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-11-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: child-custody civil-rights criminal-procedure criminal-protective-orders due-process equal-protection family-law latino-fathers parental-rights
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

Latino (nexiem teritae).
thould
Mabe Fathers, ineledi
Q
he
Protection
Catholia-Chistian
plovided

qual
lnde Law
guaranteed
Due
Prozess
and
a
Itates Constitution under
ly
the
United
1T and 6 amend merts
the
5m
140
on
1
matters
related
to
Protective Onders and the
Modifications of
said orders.
"
Clause undesr the Fifth

Should
Double
Feopardy
Founteenth, Fuat and Six Amendment
Amerdment and
apply
Male Fathers,incuding
protections
to
Latino
(nexican
Heitage)
Catholic- Chustians
related to
on matters
Criminal
Protective
Orders
post 'Not-Guilty
verdicts, s0 as
jury
menot childien
2
shield
non-victim
exonerated Father, from
unclusion
saidl
in
Garent.
Protective Onders againat the Male

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses require the State to provide fathers, including Latino fathers, with procedural safeguards in child custody and criminal protective order proceedings

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-08-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
2019-08-08
Application (19A148) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 17, 2019.
2019-06-14
Application (19A148) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 18, 2019 to August 17, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Arthur Lopez
Arthur Lopez — Petitioner