| 21-1550 |
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (7)Relisted (2) |
civil-procedure climate-change federal-common-law federal-jurisdiction greenhouse-gas-emissions standing |
1. Whether federal common law necessarily and exclusively governs claims seeking redress for injuries allegedly caused by the effect of interstate gre… |
38.0 |
| 22-324 |
Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff, et al. v. Christopher Garnier, et ux. |
Ninth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (12)Relisted (3) |
blocking-access circuit-split civil-rights first-amendment free-speech public-official social-media standing state-action |
Whether a public official engages in state action subject to the First Amendment by blocking an individual from the official's personal social-media a… |
23.5 |
| 22-611 |
Kevin Lindke v. James R. Freed |
Sixth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (9)Relisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-scrutiny first-amendment free-speech government-duty government-official public-forum public-official social-media state-action |
Whether a public official's social media activity can constitute state action only if the official used the account to perform a governmental duty or … |
20.0 |
| 22-594 |
Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr. v. Edward H. Burnside, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
plaintiff-specific alternatives to a challenged p alternative-analysis constitutional-rights individual-accommodation obvious-alternatives penological-interests prison-regulation prison-regulations reasonable-relationship Turner-standard |
Whether, under Turner, a court may only consider proposed alternatives to a challenged policy that would apply on a prison-wide scale, or whether a co… |
17.0 |
| 22-361 |
BP p.l.c., et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2)Relisted (2) |
civil-procedure climate-change federal-common-law federal-courts federal-jurisdiction greenhouse-gas-emissions interstate-emissions jurisdiction standing statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether federal common law necessarily and exclusively governs claims seeking redress for injuries allegedly caused by the effect of interstate gre… |
13.0 |
| 22-523 |
Sunoco LP, et al. v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2)Relisted (2) |
circuit-conflict climate-change climate-change-litigation federal-jurisdiction federal-officer-removal federal-preemption greenhouse-gas-emissions jurisdictional-challenge preemption statutory-interpretation transboundary-pollution |
1. Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1442 precludes removal by federal officers and persons acting under them unless the … |
13.0 |
| 22-524 |
Shell Oil Products Co., L.L.C., et al. v. Rhode Island |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2)Relisted (2) |
climate-change federal-common-law federal-jurisdiction greenhouse-gas-emissions preemption public-nuisance removal state-law-claims subject-matter-jurisdiction transboundary-harm |
Whether a federal district court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 over nominally state-law claims seeking redress for injuries allegedly caused… |
13.0 |
| 22-564 |
Juan Carlos Salazar v. Juan Rene Molina |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
4th-amendment circuit-split excessive-force graham-v-connor law-enforcement qualified-immunity reasonableness-of-force surrender-protocol use-of-force |
After initially fleeing from police who suspected him of speeding, petitioner encountered a roadblock, pulled his car over, exited, and lay face down … |
13.0 |
| 22-495 |
Chevron Corporation, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
civil-procedure climate-change climate-injury federal-jurisdiction greenhouse-gas-emissions preemption standing state-law-claims statutory-interpretation transboundary-impact |
Whether a federal district court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 over nominally state-law claims seeking redress for injuries allegedly caused… |
12.0 |
| 22-539 |
Juliet Anilao, et al. v. Thomas J. Spota, III, Individually and as District Attorney of Suffolk County, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
1983 civil-rights constitutional-violation first-amendment prosecutorial-immunity section-1983 state-action thirteenth-amendment |
1. Whether a plaintiff can defeat a prosecutor's absolute immunity from suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by demonstrating that the prosecutor lacked any co… |
12.0 |
| 22-581 |
Heidi R. Steward, Acting Director, Oregon Department of Corrections v. Frank E. Gable |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
actual-innocence chambers-v-mississippi due-process evidence evidence-rule habeas-corpus hearsay hearsay-exception recantation third-party-confession |
1. Oregon Evidence Code Rule 804(8)(c), like Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3)(B), allows admission of an out-of-court statement against penal intere… |
11.0 |
| 22-778 |
Danielle Howard Martinez, et al. v. Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
covid-19-education declaratory-relief disability-rights free-appropriate-public-education idea-compliance individuals-with-disabilities-education-act injunctive-relief mootness mootness-doctrine school-closures state-educational-agencies |
1. Whether Petitioners' claims that the CDE Defendants violated federal law by (i) effectively waiving LEAs' compliance with the IDEA after forced sch… |
10.5 |
| 22-641 |
Daimler Trucks North America LLC v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al. |
California |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
due-process forum-activities forum-contacts non-resident-defendant personal-jurisdiction product-liability residency specific-jurisdiction territorial-limits |
The Due Process Clause permits a state court to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant only when the plaintiff's claims… |
10.0 |
| 22-947 |
Tyler G. Williams v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
armed-career-criminal-act constitutional-requirements criminal-sentencing due-process jury-trial prior-convictions proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt sentencing-enhancement |
Whether the Constitution requires an indictment, jury trial, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant's prior convictions were "co… |
8.5 |
| 22-256 |
Cletus Woodrow Bohon, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al. |
District of Columbia |
GVR |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
delegation district-court eminent-domain ferc non-delegation private-parties |
Whether a facial challenge to Congress's delegation of eminent domain power to private parties is properly filed in district court, as this Court held… |
7.0 |
| 22-919 |
Stephen Thaler v. Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
artificial-intelligence innovation-rights invention inventor inventor-definition patent patent-act patent-eligibility patent-law standing statutory-interpretation |
Does the Patent Act categorically restrict the statutory term "inventor" to human beings alone? |
6.5 |
| 22-622 |
Nadine Gazzola, et al. v. Kathleen Hochul, Governor of New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights dealer firearms firearms-regulation government-overreach licensing-scheme natural-resources-defense-council second-amendment standing winter-standard |
1. Is there a likelihood of success on the merits under
Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council that
the meaning and purpose of "to keep," as in… |
5.5 |
| 22-771 |
Renè Joseph Foley Bey, et ux. v. Steve Prator, Sheriff, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
7th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights common-law constitution damages due-process jury-trial legal-rights |
1. Does the Constitution for the United States of
America Republic (North America) guarantee that everyone
has the Right to a trial by jury in suits… |
5.5 |
| 22A747 |
Meghan M. Kelly v. Disciplinary Counsel Patricia B. Swartz, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22M97 |
Stanley Lee Bradley v. Frank Shaw, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22M98 |
Jacqueline R. Manuel v. Office of Personnel Management |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22M99 |
Dufirston Neree v. Ambassade D'Haiti |
|
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22-627 |
Harold L. Wilborn v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3) |
14th-amendment 4th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act constitutional-claims due-process procedural-due-process sovereign-immunity subject-matter-jurisdiction title-vii |
The following Questions are to provide notice of the grounds Petitioner seeks certiorari and resolve questions of particular importance.
1. Whether p… |
4.5 |
| 22-5859 |
Marcal Fraction v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-3582 circuit-split compassionate-release extraordinary-and-compelling-reasons extraordinary-reasons retroactivity sentencing-law statutory-interpretation |
A court may grant compassionate release and reduce a sentence if, after evaluating the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), it finds that extraordinary and… |
4.0 |
| 22-5894 |
Terrence Gibbs v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-3582 compassionate-release criminal-justice extraordinary-and-compelling extraordinary-circumstances federal-sentencing-law federal-statute judicial-discretion retroactivity sentence-reduction sentencing sentencing-law |
Whether non-retroactive changes in federal sentencing law, which dramatically altered sentencing exposure for those later sentenced, comprise "extraor… |
4.0 |
| 22-5958 |
Raul Tovar v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process standing statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
4.0 |
| 22-637 |
In Re Larry Elliot Klayman |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
appellate-procedure civil-rights court-intervention due-process injunctive-relief judicial-misconduct judicial-review mandamus new-trial standing |
Petitioner Larry Klayman filed a lawsuit styled Klayman v. Rao et al., 21-cv-2473 (D.D.C.) (the "Rao Case") in the U.S. District Court for the Distric… |
4.0 |
| 22-694 |
Jermaine Andra Whitaker v. Timothy C. Ward, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights covid-19 covid-19-restrictions due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance prison-access prison-law-library statute-of-limitations |
1. Whether the 11th circuit Court erred in determining that the covid-19 pandemic, which led to the quarantine of the Wheeler Correctional Facility fo… |
4.0 |
| 22-808 |
Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
charitable-deduction deadlines equitable-tolling hardship-exemption I.R.C.-170(f)(12) internal-revenue-code statutory-interpretation substantiation-deadline substantiation-evidence summary-judgment tax-law |
1. Whether equitable tolling may extend substantiation evidence gathering deadlines under I.R.C. § 170(f)(12).
2. Whether Congress lacks the power to… |
3.5 |
| 22-814 |
William R. Tinnerman v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure district-court-jurisdiction flora-rule internal-revenue-code jurisdiction jurisdictional-prerequisite standing statutory-interpretation tax-refund |
1. Under the language of 28 U.S.C. §1346(a)(1), is full payment of tax alleged to be owed for an entire taxable period a jurisdictional prerequisite f… |
3.5 |
| 22-841 |
Christopher H. West v. Robert May, Warden, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
6th-amendment constitutional-rights cronic-standard due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance sandin-v-conner sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington trial-counsel |
1. In denying petitioner's habeas certificate of appealability, where the 3d Circuit's review of the record entirely overlooked that the facts in tria… |
3.5 |
| 22-845 |
Robert Thornton v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-deference due-process duty-to-assist judicial-notice judicial-review statutory-interpretation veterans-benefits |
In the veterans-benefits system, Congress has
provided that an otherwise-final agency decision is sub
ject to one review on appeal to the Secretary. … |
3.5 |
| 22-903 |
Jay Goodley v. Charles M. Greene |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights court-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-capacity judicial-conduct judicial-disqualification judicial-recusal recusal separation-of-powers |
1. Whether a person can be treated equally under the law when a judge is changing the law?
2. Whether it is a normal judicial function for a judge wh… |
3.5 |
| 22-930 |
ESET, LLC, et al. v. Finjan LLC |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
claim-interpretation claim-term-definition conflicting-definitions definiteness federal-circuit-precedent incorporation-by-reference inventor-lexicography patent-claim-construction patent-definiteness patentee-lexicography teva-v-sandoz |
1. In a case of first impression for this Court, where a patentee expressly defines a claim term, may the Federal Circuit disregard its decades-old pr… |
3.5 |
| 22-953 |
Pablo Calderon v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
criminal-charges criminal-procedure district-court due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-statute habeas-corpus statutory-interpretation substantive-law |
Does a federal district court have habeas corpus jurisdiction when a substantive element of the criminal charges was not found under the law mandated … |
3.5 |
| 22-6570 |
Richard Galvan Montiel v. Kevin Chappell, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
atkins-claim atkins-v-virginia capital-punishment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mental-retardation strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Where a capitally sentenced habeas corpus petitioner relies on uncontradicted Strickland mitigating evidence and United States District Court findings… |
0.5 |
| 22-6578 |
Derrick Tyrone Moore v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
armed-career-criminal-act burglary-statute federal-courts generic-offense mens-rea precedent state-law state-law-interpretation statutory-interpretation violent-felony |
Whether there is a reasonable probability of different result if the court below is directed to reconsider its judgment in light of Wooden v. United S… |
0.5 |
| 22-5878 |
William D. King v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-3582 circuit-split extraordinary-and-compelling extraordinary-compelling-reason judicial-decisions judicial-discretion legal-developments sentence-modification statutory-interpretation |
When, whether deciding if a defendant has presented an "extraordinary and
compelling" reason for a sentence modification under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(… |
-1.0 |
| 22-7096 |
Appellant 1 and Appellant 2 v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-discretion appellate-procedure breach constitutional contract-interpretation cooperation-agreement crime-of-violence judicial-review sentencing sentencing-guidelines |
Was it unconstitutional and improper for the Fifth Circuit to rely on the government's newly argued application of an undefined contract provision to … |
-1.5 |
| 22-7126 |
Andre Chandler, aka Mac Dre v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
attorney-client-privilege constitutional-rights due-process government-misconduct prejudice sixth-amendment trial-strategy witness-cooperation witness-debriefing |
Did the government violate Petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights when it debriefed a witness who, by the time of trial was clearly cooperating with the … |
-1.5 |
| 22-7145 |
Abdullah Khabir Yusuf v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process in-re-winship jackson-v-virginia reasonable-doubt standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence |
The question presented is whether a federal court of appeals reviewing a defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convi… |
-1.5 |
| 22-5121 |
Barbara Marie Frantz v. Kansas, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
8th-amendment civil-rights deliberate-indifference due-process medical-care qualified-immunity |
Whether the United States Supreme Court should decide, or further investigate, a case of Respondent's death, dependent on deliberate indifference to A… |
-4.0 |
| 22-5284 |
Michael Duntae Fagans v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
actual-innocence brady-violation constitutional-violation due-process ineffective-assistance sentencing-enhancement speedy-trial |
1) Whether Fagans is entitled te relief
evidentiary hearing , uhere the Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit and the U.S. District of the
Eastern Distric… |
-4.0 |
| 22-5588 |
John Wakefield v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
artificial-intelligence confrontation-clause due-process expert-testimony forensic-evidence probabilistic-genotyping sixth-amendment source-code |
Does the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution require the disclosure of the source code of an artificial inte… |
-4.0 |
| 22-5646 |
Fred Freeman v. Bryan P. Stirling, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
8th-amendment appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights classification-error court-of-appeals due-process equal-protection judicial-discretion procedural-review qualified-immunity sovereign-immunity standing |
Question not identified. |
-4.0 |
| 22-6021 |
George Guo v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
capital-murder criminal-procedure delayed-death-homicide due-process ex-post-facto fair-warning jackson-standard statute-of-limitations structural-error |
1. Under the Jackson standard and per Garrett v. U.S. 471 U.S. 779,1791, is this conviction of
Texas Penalty code §19.03 (a) (2) capital murder a "Vo… |
-4.0 |
| 22-6783 |
Meghan M. Kelly v. Disciplinary Counsel Patricia B. Swartz, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts bar-dues civil-rights disciplinary-action due-process first-amendment free-speech reciprocal-discipline religious-freedom |
1. Whether the Third Circuit abused its discretion by denying my Motion to stay the civil rights proceeding relating to civil rights violations agains… |
-4.0 |
| 22-6096 |
Gary Eye v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment capital-punishment civil-rights competency due-process mental-illness |
hon the leg stacki of ad g chargs beome Redocie to al ffds illegal sowtence which was mode illegal bn the 1t step Act passed by corgress in per. 2018)… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6575 |
Paul Michael Malagerio v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constructive-entry exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment home-invasion knock-and-announce law-enforcement santana-doctrine scott-v-harris search-and-seizure |
1. Whether multiple armed law enforcement officers surrounding a home at
daybreak, repeatedly banging on the home's only door, refusing to leave,
and … |
-4.5 |
| 22-6579 |
Jaime Hoyos v. Ronald Davis, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
batson-challenge due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment jury-selection peremptory-challenges peremptory-strikes racial-discrimination standard-of-review voir-dire |
DID THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS VIOLATE
PETITIONER'S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTEENTH
AMENDMENT BY ITS FAILURE TO APPLY THIS COURT'S
STANDAR D SET F… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6788 |
In Re Kent Williams |
|
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts administrative-law appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus ninth-circuit prisoner-rights standing |
Should this court order the Minth cirout court of Appeals to discontinue its practice of serding its litigants to a third Party (zdao Dept.of orrectio… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6851 |
David Freeman v. John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254d appellate-procedure due-process federal-habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel party-presentation sixth-amendment state-post-conviction |
(1) Under these circumstances, does a court of appeals violate the
fundamental principles of party presentation and Petitioner's due
process rights?
… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6862 |
Benjamin Young v. Alabama |
Alabama |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-trial character-evidence criminal-procedure culpability-phase dawson-v-delaware first-amendment fourteenth-amendment gang-membership sentencing-phase |
Whether, as in the sentencing phase of a capital trial under Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 (1992), the First and Fourteenth Amendment prohibit the … |
-4.5 |
| 22-7089 |
In Re William Hopmeier |
|
Denied |
IFP |
aggregate-effects-doctrine child-pornography congressional-findings constitutional-authority due-process economic-impact fair-notice gonzales-v-raich interstate-commerce |
1. Under Title 18, U.S.C. § 2251(a), is there proper Fair Notice, as set forth by this Court in Fasulo v United States, 272 U.S. 620 (1926); that a cr… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7144 |
In Re David Priester |
|
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review constitutional-rights conviction counsel-representation due-process extraordinary-writ federal-constitutional ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment trial |
Does the Sixth Amendment require the Assistance of and from counsel be appointed? A Federal and Constitutional matter effecting five trial(s). And see… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7162 |
In Re Anthony Dewayne Lee Turner |
|
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process excessive-force fourth-amendment probable-cause warrantless-arrest |
On 10/*/21 H/a^WvJtY) aa jUx V'\A\noioa cc
WWy 'X CO v^vic+jk) vov+Uoal- Woorrat^i" ^vvj\
\p\oO^ VioWt]rLf'oWoWx- daM£ot-p
vn/Uuj J-td (P^vcxr dr^tJ w… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7163 |
In Re Marcus Marko Bachmayer |
|
Denied |
IFP |
bill-of-rights civil-rights constitutional-protections due-process familial-rights family-law federal-common-law habeas-corpus standing state-applicability |
Whether a child's familial relationships are protected.
Whether the Bill of Rights is applicable to the States.
Whether the district court engaged i… |
-4.5 |
| 21-8096 |
Barbara Frantz v. Patrick C. Frantz |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
beneficiary-dispute civil-procedure contingent-beneficiary criminal-appeal evidence evidence-standard life-insurance murder-allegation summary-judgment |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 22-5834 |
Jose A. Torres v. Lisa Mitchell, Superintendent, Old Colony Correctional Center, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-review due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions legal-relief procedural-review standard-of-review trial-error |
1) WHETHER MR. TORRES WAS ENTITLED TO RELIEF OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING, ON HIS CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, WHERE TH… |
-6.0 |
| 22-6499 |
DeJuan B. Thornton-Bey v. Warden, Allenwood USP |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights custody due-process parental-rights standing |
/• Xi 71 j ffa(y yf ji*** ^/«cxaa )li^ku '/A A- (i
(a( li'l d&&Al<fT fl&j xfj-jSW.
'fh ^^ y// f/*cf t i/e J "fp / ffa \
QA&tA ^ jH^f n,ifXuo
^ U/*/ y… |
-6.0 |
| 22-6512 |
Frank L. Perry v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Florida |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
direct-review due-process equal-protection finality finality-date fourteenth-amendment lamb-v-state montgomery-v-state state-court |
WHETHER THE LOWER FLORIDA STATE COURT'S ERROR IN FAILING TO CORRECTLY CALCULATE THE DATE THAT PETITIONER'S DIRECT REVIEW OF HIS CASE BECAME "FINAL" IN… |
-6.0 |
| 22-7108 |
Andrew Ryan v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-4241d appellate-review competency competency-determination due-process incompetent-defendant statutory-rights timing-violations united-states-v-olano waiver |
I. Whether under United States v. Olano an incompetent defendant waives appellate review of his statutory and due process right to a timely resolution… |
-6.0 |
| 22-6830 |
Michael Joseph Loukas v. Sarah Schroeder, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
404(b) due-process evidence-standard ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion medication-warning-labels prior-bad-acts prosecutorial-misconduct separation-of-powers sixth-circuit-review |
1. Was the Sixth Circuit decision based on an unreasonable determination
of the facts in light of the Evidance presented in the state court
proceedi… |
-6.5 |
| 22-6942 |
Kwame Burrell v. Willis Chapman, Acting Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 6th-amendment appellate-counsel appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process guilty-plea judicial-discretion right-to-counsel state-constitution |
THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO PROTECT PETITIONER'S FUNDAMENTAL DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO SUBSTITUTE APPELLATE COUNSEL SUBSEQUENT TO HIS GUILTY PLEA WHEN ORIGIN… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7001 |
Sheniqua L. Watson v. Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination equal-pay-act factor-other-than-sex job-requirements prima-facie-case substantially-equal veteran-status veterans-preference |
Question 1:
The District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Richmond Division and the United States District
Court of Appeals for the Fourth … |
-6.5 |
| 22-7002 |
J. T. v. Maryland |
Maryland |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abandonment-neglect-abuse child-welfare due-process fourteenth-amendment incarceration parental-rights statutory-interpretation termination-of-parental-rights vagueness |
1. Does Maryland's adoption of "the best interest of the child" standard
when adjudicating termination of parental rights cases conflict with the fir… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7007 |
Axel Domingo Diego v. Indiana |
Indiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights custody-determination due-process jdb-v-north-carolina law-enforcement-interrogation miranda-custody-rule miranda-rights reasonable-officer reasonable-person reasonable-person-standard translated-interrogation translation-context |
When law enforcement officers use a translator during an interrogation, does Miranda's custody rule consider the unique circumstances presented by the… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7008 |
Heath R. Barker v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability child-sexual-abuse forensic-interview forensic-interviews habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment trial-counsel |
1) Was Petitioner entitled to a certificate of appealability (COA) on
his claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under
the Sixth Ame… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7009 |
Davion Smith v. California |
California |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
adult-sentence criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment jury-trial juvenile-adjudication juvenile-delinquent sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment |
I. Does a state violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when it denies the right to a jury trial to a juvenile delinquent on the gr… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7023 |
Maria Orosco v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 appointed-counsel civil-rights due-process federal-habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel notice-of-appeal procedural-default timely-filing |
Roe v. Glover v. Idaho, 126 S.Ct.
Should my writ Certiorari be granted inasmuch as my appointed attorney failed to file a timely Notice of Appeal for… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7043 |
Jean Montgomery v. Scialla Associates Inc., et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process employment federal-courts government-employment |
1. Did the court err when stating Charles Scialla and William Simpson who did not have to be attorneys to represent Petitioner?
2. Did the court err … |
-6.5 |
| 22-7057 |
Raymond Pniewski, Jr. v. Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
boykin-standard boykin-v-alabama constitutional-rights court-advisement due-process guilty-plea involuntary-plea judicial-procedure people-v-jaworski |
(1) Do THE RULINGS OF BOYKIN v_ ALABAMA, 395 U.S. 238 (1969), AND PEOPLE v JAWORSKI, 387 MI 21 (1972), VIOLATE PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL AND DUE PRO… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7076 |
Servando Pineda-Valdez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
acceptance-of-responsibility constitutional-claims counsel-performance criminal-procedure guilty-plea habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing writ-of-certiorari |
Should a writ of certiorari be granted since Servando-Pineda 's title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion sufficiently alleged constitutional claims violations du… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7092 |
Lorenzo Hardwick v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability collateral-estoppel double-jeopardy fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel third-circuit |
DID THE APPEALS COURT FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ERROR BY DENYING PETITIONERS CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WHERE APPELLATE COUNSEL RENDERED INEFFECTIVE ASS… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7094 |
Michael Lee Gordon v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction standing statutory-provisions |
ddo u H~ s"
&rro r ^<V4W Crh
//v^T,te.th£f~ or- AO
/?.£Cu^e^ i4a |
-6.5 |
| 22-7097 |
Monta Olander Jordan v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment good-faith-exception gps-tracking leon-exception probable-cause search-and-seizure search-warrant |
Whether The Court Of Appeals Misapplied United States v. Leon , 468 U.S. 897 (1984) When It Affirmed The District Court's Refusal To Suppress All Evid… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7100 |
Felipe Nevarez v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process objection-timing speedy-trial speedy-trial-act statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation tenth-circuit trial-delay waiver |
Does the Speedy Trial Act require the accused to object to lack of speedy trial only after the time has lapsed, or can the accused assert this right p… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7101 |
Charles Eugene Nolden v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3582 abuse-of-discretion compassionate-release criminal-justice criminal-sentencing federal-statute sentence-reduction sentencing third-circuit |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit abused its discretion in denying Nolden's Motion for Compassionate Release/Reduction … |
-6.5 |
| 22-7103 |
George Lincoln Stanley, IV v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-1291 confrontation-clause criminal-procedure hearsay-testimony ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel jurisdiction kidnapping kidnapping-charges sixth-amendment sufficiency-of-evidence |
The following questions are exceptional circumstances that warrants the exercise of the court's discretionafcyvpowers and adequate relief cannot be ob… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7106 |
Brian Keith Wells, aka B. K. Wells v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
counsel-denial criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing ineffective-assistance procedural-review role-enhancement sentencing sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment sixth-circuit substantive-reasonableness ussg-3b1.1 |
Whether this honorable Court should grant certiorari to review whether Mr. Wells request for new counsel should have been granted?
Whether this honor… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7117 |
Noel Macapagal v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
adult-intermediary commerce-clause criminal-enticement enticement federal-crime interstate-commerce minor minor-protection state-authority statutory-interpretation |
The government convicted petitioner-defendant Noel Macapagal of violating 18 U.S.C. §2422(b). As the government invoked it to convict Macapagal, this … |
-6.5 |
| 22-7121 |
Christopher Barret v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 criminal-procedure de-novo-resentencing de-novo-review direct-appeal resentencing sentencing sentencing-discretion vacatur |
1. Whether, following the vacatur of one or more counts, either pursuant to a direct appeal or a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, a district court must conduc… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7122 |
Quintel West v. Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel expert-testimony fourth-amendment probable-cause prosecutorial-misconduct reckless-driving sixth-amendment warrantless-arrest |
I Detective Doyle testified that petitioner was arrested without a warrant for reckless driving. The reckless driving allegation is not supported by a… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7129 |
Thomas P. Thayer v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
categorical-approach criminal-conviction federal-law minor minor-protection prior-conviction registration-requirement sex-offender-registration sex-offense statutory-interpretation |
This Court has held that, where Congress makes the application of federal law turn on a prior "conviction" that, "by its nature," "involves" certain "… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7130 |
Timothy Fletcher v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
booker-decision criminal-procedure district-court-notice federal-rules federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-discretion mandatory-guidelines notice-requirement sentencing sentencing-guidelines united-states-v-booker |
Whether this Court's elimination of the mandatory sentencing guidelines pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) has rendered Fed. R. … |
-6.5 |
| 22-7137 |
Eric Deangelo Griggs v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burrage-v-united-states criminal-conviction cross-examination drug-distribution due-process heroin-distribution jury-instruction perjured-testimony strict-liability |
I. Whether a person can be convicted for distribution of heroin causing death using a jury instruction that makes the offense a strict liability crime… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7138 |
Muzammil Ali v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure downward-variance due-process fifth-amendment jail-phone-calls motion-for-continuance sentencing sixth-amendment speedy-trial speedy-trial-act |
1. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING THAT ALI'S FIFTH AND SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WERE NOT VIOLATED UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT.
2. WHETH… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7139 |
Bobby Richardson v. Richard A. Luna, Warden |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence civil-procedure constitutional-rights federal-procedure habeas-corpus savings-clause standing subject-matter-jurisdiction |
WHETHER OR NOT MR. RICHARDSON'S SPECIAL PLEA TO THE LOWER COURTS LACK OF FACTUAL DEDICATE THUS DECISION PURSUANT TO WARS UNOPPOSED FED P. CH /, P 12(b… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7142 |
William Matthew Plump v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process fraud legal-ethics legal-misrepresentation mail-fraud misrepresentation sentencing wire-fraud |
The law of the Eighth Circit is that an attomey volates the federal mail andwi frand stattes 18 U.5.8 134 and 343, if thy Make Mat Misstatements or am… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7146 |
Daren Bernard Razz, III v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3161 criminal-procedure due-process federal-prosecution government-delay indictment-timing sixth-amendment speedy-trial statutory-delay |
Issue 1: Petitioner briefs the following point in an abundance of caution to preserve the issue regarding the denial of his second motion to dismiss t… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7155 |
Kalid Koron Ocean-Avent v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidentiary-errors fair-trial firearm firearm-possession jury reasonable-doubt |
I.
Whether the Government proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Ocean-Avent possessed a firearm.
II.
right to a fair trial. |
-6.5 |
| 22-7156 |
James Anthony Rogers v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-violation civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection prosecutorial-misconduct |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 22-7171 |
Aczel Cardena-Sosa, aka Jesus Garcia, aka Jorge Cardenas-Sosa, aka Gasel Sosa, aka Jorge Cardenas v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-litigation civil-procedure civil-rights clean-water-act due-process extraordinary-circumstances first-step-act pfoa-contamination pfos-contamination standing |
(1) Whether Certiorari should be granted to determine whether Concepcion v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 54 (U.S. June 27, 2022) govern Civil Litigation … |
-6.5 |