Whether the United States Supreme Court should decide, or further investigate, a case of Respondent's death, dependent on deliberate indifference to Appellant's serious medical needs, as US District (Dept of Attorneys Appendix MV and FRV in Appendix9d(M(W<) MS,fH^Mlz.'s SKud SuKdWcj H6F. ISA- £\(£ ANd fftR UfWftfti, Cftusc^ tf&tmteur dAfYWje. frtj.FMrz- y&rm&sc dte^osis Afo SAowitft) \rt0eseNu09 - MSdfWz. disputed detftihXe \Mfts fc»em&^ fVNd £Ap€d «v)fw Sa/a^e HdjUfties of GMs AN^d AMd sm ffbduR^SVie is -&(( of N&fs MffF b^j fA^StcA^ £ka,a. H€r 36^80^ d^-fesided -iteviifdei nbdomaJ ^ W A deblidm^ AIgAlca( detect ftd O0GR fvVG '{OWE Of ACC63S Mo MedfCAl tea^^Featoos U^R^raj^9 M£4 cca[ CDtfdttfoMS . fYK.ffMrz N dfr(dd&^ of S€^'oa5 RWSiCAt iMJVU^f, UM^e^SLiKSCj d6AAH. COMfpfAc^ do fdapdat (fyfftWv ftcSpoAcfe^S, a- a(v $ tet^ tAVe^Med b\( dffe CPaFUn&I diMiStod ef idf fftc, bH * differ of ifG UdvfeL 9tA{€$ AtfflAA6( 6tM€£A(5 OffiGf 9,C. (dV-ftez. is f ViAiSft-eblO^ Old A SCAlf \t&NC) UtdldWd A5 ^Ud^es, Sfd€ ffiosEcafcAs, Coiuzr (5£po0€AS/ AlfidfcAt f^eatiOKie^ / (dfAy AMd Kmsas fiO^lYi&^r OFFdaVus, UUdeR M\jes%MiON/S- -TU'5 9^ourtdii^ MSd^ATzis O^Ad dAMpqe a M^dtcAi emi btosidiM^ wdd [Ws.Fkamt^ cAiMitdAi (m \ak&m$ ^ ^ Af(?fA\ M &%m. #(. FraeR^oj (vledM CARE is W&ted, dof- V\ope^ (<k (VIFten^ 9aNivM . sHod<5^ mA c&miMai (Mdacr, (Vti$t@Atffle*ar&F C0^9dMfoMM S

Whether Petitioner, Ms. Franz, has stated a claim for Respondents' deprived deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs