| 22-6474 |
Cody Jay Riley v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-01-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence aedpa americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights due-process hiv incarceration penological-interests scientific-evidence |
1. Does a state violate the Americans with Disabilities Act when incarcerating a person living with HIV outside of any penological interests?
2. When… |
| 22-594 |
Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr. v. Edward H. Burnside, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-12-27 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
plaintiff-specific alternatives to a challenged p alternative-analysis constitutional-rights individual-accommodation obvious-alternatives penological-interests prison-regulation prison-regulations reasonable-relationship Turner-standard |
Whether, under Turner, a court may only consider proposed alternatives to a challenged policy that would apply on a prison-wide scale, or whether a co… |
| 21-1405 |
Lester J. Smith v. Timothy C. Ward, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-05-06 |
Denied |
Amici (8) |
accommodation circuit-court-review circuit-split civil-rights deference penological-interests prison-policy prisoners-rights religious-freedom religious-liberty rluipa |
In Knight v. Thompson , the Eleventh Circuit concluded —on remand following Holt v. Hobbs , 574 U.S. 352 (2015) —that the Religious Land Use and Insti… |
| 21-617 |
Christopher N. Payne v. Jahal Taslimi, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-10-27 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fourth-amendment inmate-privacy medical-confidentiality penological-interests prejudice privacy qualified-immunity |
Do inmates have a constitutional right to privacy in their HIV status, as the Second, Third, and Sixth Circuits have held (subject to legitimate penol… |
| 18-9662 |
Mark Alan Lane v. Josias Salazar, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-06-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bureau-of-prisons due-process first-amendment penological-interests prisoner-speech prisoners-rights procunier-v-martinez prohibited-act-code-203 true-threats void-for-vagueness |
As construed to apply to statements in outgoing mail that are not true threats, is Prohibited Act Code 203 crafted so that its "limitation of First Am… |
| 18-1172 |
Tynisa Williams v. City of Cleveland, Ohio |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-03-11 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights delousing detainee-rights due-process fourth-amendment penological-interests prison-policy privacy-rights reasonable-alternatives reasonable-search strip-search |
Whether the court below erroneously held that the physical delousing of all detainees entering the Cleveland Workhouse, whereby delousing solution was… |
| 18-7762 |
Douglas Fauconier v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-02-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure burden-of-proof civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process legitimate-penological-interests penological-interests prison-regulation prison-regulations prisoner-rights |
1. What minimum showing of proof must prison officials establish on the record, to meet their initial burden of proof, in demonstrating that a prison … |