No. 22-594
Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr. v. Edward H. Burnside, et al.
Tags: plaintiff-specific alternatives to a challenged p alternative-analysis constitutional-rights individual-accommodation obvious-alternatives penological-interests prison-regulation prison-regulations reasonable-relationship Turner-standard
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, under Turner, a court may only consider proposed alternatives to a challenged policy that would apply on a prison-wide scale, or whether a court may also consider a more narrow alternative that would need only apply to the individual plaintiff.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court may consider a narrow alternative that would apply only to the individual plaintiff under Turner v. Safley
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-04-04
Reply of petitioner Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr. filed. (Distributed)
2023-03-20
Brief of respondents Edward H. Burnside, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-02-17
Brief amici curiae of Rutherford Institute, et al. filed.
2023-02-15
Brief amicus curiae of Council on American-Islamic Relations filed.
2023-02-15
Brief amici curiae of Muslim Advocates, et al. filed.
2023-01-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 20, 2023.
2023-01-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 17, 2023 to March 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-18
Response Requested. (Due February 17, 2023)
2023-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent Edward H. Burnside, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 26, 2023)
2022-11-02
Application (22A377) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 22, 2022.
2022-10-31
Application (22A377) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 22, 2022 to January 20, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Council on American-Islamic Relations
Alan Michael Mygatt-Tauber — Attorney at Law, Amicus
Edward H. Burnside, et al.
Stephen John Petrany — Georgia Department of Law, Respondent
Hjalmar Rodriguez, Jr.
Jeremy Charles Marwell — Vinson & Elkins LLP, Petitioner
Muslim Advocates and Muslim Justice League
Justin Bryan Cox — Law Office of Justin B. Cox, Amicus
The Rutherford Institute And The Jewish Coalition For Religious Liberty
Theodore Augustus Howard — Wiley Rein LLP, Amicus