No. 22-7100
Felipe Nevarez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process objection-timing speedy-trial speedy-trial-act statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation tenth-circuit trial-delay waiver
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the Speedy Trial Act require the accused to object to lack of speedy trial only after the time has lapsed, or can the accused assert this right prior?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Speedy Trial Act require the accused to object to lack of speedy trial only after the time has lapsed, or can the accused assert this right prior?
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Felipe Nevarez
James L. Hankins — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent