No. 22-7142
William Matthew Plump v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process fraud legal-ethics legal-misrepresentation mail-fraud misrepresentation sentencing wire-fraud
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
The law of the Eighth Circit is that an attomey volates the federal mail andwi frand stattes 18 U.5.8 134 and 343, if thy Make Mat Misstatements or amissions to the court. United States v. Hansmeer 988 F.3d 428 (8th Cir. 2021). At Petitioner's Sentencing, Counsel for the on fecaa Peti ee when he comied his of nd that Peter as tnpor du in his chid dapr a The material mistatemn werevidati e mail-wire frand tats, acordine igth Cireits hanns decision.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause prohibits the government from using criminal fraud to punish or penalize an attorney for immaterial misstatements or omissions to the court
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
William M. Plump
William Matthew Plump — Petitioner