| 22-7145 |
Abdullah Khabir Yusuf v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-03-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process in-re-winship jackson-v-virginia reasonable-doubt standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence |
The question presented is whether a federal court of appeals reviewing a defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convi… |
| 22-6863 |
Christopher Lynn Gonzales v. Susan Washburn, Superintendent, Eastern Washington Correctional Facility |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-02-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2254-d-1 due-process forcible-compulsion habeas-corpus in-re-winship jackson-v-virginia reasonable-doubt state-court-review supreme-court-law unreasonable-factual-determinations |
Could reasonable jurists debate whether, under the Due Process Clause standards set out in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), and In re Winship… |
| 22-5908 |
Giles McGhee v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-10-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment in-re-winship ineffective-assistance jackson-v-virginia reasonable-doubt sixth-amendment |
1. Reasonable jurists would determine that Mr. McGhee was denied his right to Due Process of Law under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to t… |
| 20-7852 |
John Elmer v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
2021-04-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process in-re-winship jackson-v-virginia sufficiency-of-evidence |
1. Reasonable jurists would determine that the State failed to meet the stringent burden of proof as established by Jackson v. Virginia and In re: Win… |
| 19-7120 |
Gilbert Sanchez v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-12-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
apprendi-v-new-jersey blakely-v-washington criminal-appeals criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus in-re-winship jury-trial right-to-trial-by-jury sixth-amendment texas-constitution |
1. Is the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution violated when the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denies an Applicant habeas relief b… |
| 19-7025 |
Michael Feliciano v. George Miller, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Waymart, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-12-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
carrier due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel eyewitness eyewitness-testimony in-re-winship ineffective-assistance investigation jury-instructions reasonable-doubt sixth-amendment strickland strickland-standard |
1. Is the State court of last resort and U.S. Court of Appeals decision which denied petitioner's claim that he was deprived of his Sixth Amendment ri… |
| 19-5810 |
Daniel Lopez DeJesus v. Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-09-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof constitutional-error criminal-procedure due-process harmless-error in-re-winship ineffective-assistance jury-instruction jury-instructions presumption winship |
Mr. Dejesus alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a jury instruction that effectively aided the state to surpass the… |
| 18-7270 |
Antonio Bryant v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-01-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process in-re-winship ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel involuntary-confessions involuntary-statements people-v-bryant standard-of-proof sufficiency-of-evidence |
I). Whether the Illinois Appellate Court's decision in People v. Bryant. 2o18 IL App (50) I43578-U. is contradictory tothis Court's decision sufficien… |
| 18-6364 |
Phap Buth v. Massachusetts |
Massachusetts |
2018-10-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
barnes-v-united-states burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment in-re-winship |
Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment allows reliance on an inference that is at best more likely than not, but not beyond a reas… |
| 18-5075 |
Felix A. Okafor v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-07-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
beyond-reasonable-doubt-standard Blockburger-test blockburger-v-united-states Brady-v-Maryland concurrent-sentence criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process exculpatory-evidence glover-v-united-states in-re-winship kyles-v-whitley ray-v-united-states sentencing sentencing-determination sixth-amendment |
MAY A CONVICTION THAT IS ADMITTEDLY A VIOLATION OF THE CONCURTRENT SENTENCE DOCTRINE BE ALLOWED TO STAND IN LIGHT OF RAY V. UNITED STATES, ,481 U.S. 7… |