No. 18-7270
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process in-re-winship ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel involuntary-confessions involuntary-statements people-v-bryant standard-of-proof sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy
CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
I). Whether the Illinois Appellate Court's decision in People v. Bryant. 2o18 IL App (50) I43578-U. is contradictory tothis Court's decision sufficiency of the evidence.
2). Whether the Illinois Appellate Court's decision in People v. Bryant, 20s8 IL App (1t) I43578-U, is contradictory to this Court's opinions in Jackson v. Denn0, 378 U.S.368 (1964) and
3). Whether the Illinois Appellate Court's decision in People v. Bryant, 2018 IL App (Is) 143 578-U, Ts contradictory to this Courf's holding in Strickland'v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984),
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Illinois Appellate Court's decision in People v. Bryant is contradictory to this Court's decisions in In re Winship, Jackson v. Denno, and Strickland v. Washington
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-29
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Antonio Bryant
Antonio Bryant — Petitioner
Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent