Giles McGhee v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
1. Reasonable jurists would determine that Mr. McGhee was denied his right to Due Process of Law under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution where the State failed to meet its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. McGhee was guilty of two Counts of First Degree Murder. Jackson, v, Virginia : In re: Winship : Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.;
2. Reasonable jurists would determine that Mr. McGhee was denied his right to Due Process of Law under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution where he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel.
Did the State fail to meet its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. McGhee was guilty of two Counts of First Degree Murder?