No. 20-7852
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process in-re-winship jackson-v-virginia sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Reasonable jurists would determine that the State failed to meet the stringent burden of proof as established by Jackson v. Virginia and In re: Winship.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the State failed to meet the stringent burden of proof as established by Jackson v. Virginia and In re: Winship
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-26
Waiver of right of respondent State of Louisiana to respond filed.
2021-04-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2021)
Attorneys
John Elmer
John Elmer — Petitioner
State of Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent