No. 22-6788

In Re Kent Williams

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-02-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts administrative-law appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus ninth-circuit prisoner-rights standing
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-04-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

Should this court order the Minth cirout court of Appeals to discontinue its practice of serding its litigants to a third Party (zdao Dept.of orrections va efi nsteaof serving the prsoner itigant diretty and /or shold this court order the lower court to estaslish pratocalls the Third party (Iboc must meet that will eusure that The dowments are delivered to the prisoner and in a reliable and confidertal manner that the law demands?

Is it proper for the ninth cirount court of appeals to serve its orders and answers to prisoncrs petitioners to a third party instead of to the petitoner himself?

Is the Zoc's hardling of the e-filed doumcnts s0 Impropper that the vinth cireut must fist correct, estalsh serving and handling protocals for the IDoC to follou before it can continve to serve IDoc

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should this court order the ninth circuit court of appeals to discontinue its practice of sending orders and answers to prisoner litigants to a third party (Idaho Dept of Corrections) via efile instead of serving the prisoner litigant directly

Docket Entries

2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2022-12-15
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 17, 2023)

Attorneys

Kent Williams
Kent Glen Williams — Petitioner