No. 22-7108
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-4241d appellate-review competency competency-determination due-process incompetent-defendant statutory-rights timing-violations united-states-v-olano waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether under United States v. Olano an incompetent defendant waives appellate review of his statutory and due process right to a timely resolution of his competency determination when defense counsel fails to object to timing violations under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) with the committing court?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether under United States v. Olano an incompetent defendant waives appellate review of his statutory and due process right to a timely resolution of his competency determination when defense counsel fails to object to timing violations under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) with the committing court?
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-27
Motion (22M87) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2023-03-08
MOTION (22M87) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-01-25
Motion (22M87) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2023-01-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Andrew Ryan
Stephen C. Moss — Assistant Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent