No. 22-7106
Brian Keith Wells, aka B. K. Wells v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: counsel-denial criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing ineffective-assistance procedural-review role-enhancement sentencing sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment sixth-circuit substantive-reasonableness ussg-3b1.1
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this honorable Court should grant certiorari to review whether Mr. Wells request for new counsel should have been granted?
Whether this honorable Court should grant certiorari to review the Sixth Circuit's determination that a four-level role enhancement under USSG § 3B1.1(a) was appropriate?
Whether this honorable Court should grant certiorari to review the substantive reasonableness of Mr. Wells' sentence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Wells' request for new counsel should have been granted
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Brian Wells
Stephenie Nichole Lape — Stephenie N. Lape, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent