No. 22-7130
Timothy Fletcher v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: booker-decision criminal-procedure district-court-notice federal-rules federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-discretion mandatory-guidelines notice-requirement sentencing sentencing-guidelines united-states-v-booker
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court's elimination of the mandatory sentencing guidelines pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) has rendered Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(h), requiring a district court to provide the parties with reasonable notice of any contemplated departure, a nullity.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the elimination of mandatory sentencing guidelines pursuant to United States v. Booker has rendered Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(h) a nullity
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-03-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Timothy Fletcher
Kathryn Hayne Barnwell — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent