WHETHER THE LOWER FLORIDA STATE COURT'S ERROR IN FAILING TO CORRECTLY CALCULATE THE DATE THAT PETITIONER'S DIRECT REVIEW OF HIS CASE BECAME "FINAL" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURT'S PRECEDENT IN GRIFFIN V. KENTUCKY, U.S. V. JOHNSON AND LINKLETTER V. WALKER, THUS RESULTING IN THE FAILURE TO APPLY THE STATE HOLDINGS OF MONTGOMERY V. STATE AND LAMB V. STATE WHICH WERE DECIDED WHILE PETITIONER'S CASE WAS ON DIRECT REVIEW AND NOT YET FINAL, DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW AS GUARANTEED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

Whether the lower Florida state court's error in failing to correctly calculate the date that petitioner's direct review of his case became 'final' deprived petitioner of due process and equal protection