| 18-824 |
Thomas Rogers, et al. v. Gurbir Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (6)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (8) |
2nd-amendment carry circuit-split constitutional-carry firearm-rights heller-v-dc intermediate-scrutiny licensing second-amendment self-defense |
1. Whether the Second Amendment protects the right to carry a firearm outside the home for self-defense.
2. Whether the government may deny categoric… |
23.0 |
| 18-663 |
Fredric Russell Mance, Jr., et al. v. William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (6)Relisted (8) |
2nd-amendment constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-firearms-licensees firearm-sales firearms-regulation handgun-sales interstate-commerce second-amendment standing |
Federal law bars consumers from acquiring handguns outside their home state. This prohibition limits choice and price competition, and forces many han… |
20.0 |
| 19-27 |
Mark Cheeseman v. Joseph Polillo, Chief of Police, City of Glassboro, New Jersey, et al. |
New Jersey |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (8) |
2nd-amendment civil-rights concealed-carry discretionary-permitting due-process handgun-permit justifiable-need public-safety right-to-bear-arms second-amendment self-protection standing takings |
The State of New Jersey broadly prohibits people from carrying or otherwise possessing handguns for the purpose of personal protection—anywhere but in… |
20.0 |
| 19-423 |
Brian Kirk Malpasso, et al. v. William M. Pallozzi, in His Official Capacity as Maryland Secretary of State Police |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (8) |
2nd-amendment carry circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process handgun-carry heller law-abiding-citizens mcdonald second-amendment self-defense |
Whether the Second Amendment allows the government to prohibit typical, law-abiding citizens from carrying handguns outside the home for self defense … |
20.0 |
| 19-532 |
United States v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Relisted (14) |
anti-commandeering civil-rights federal-law federal-preemption immigration immigration-enforcement immigration-law information-sharing intergovernmental-immunity preemption sb-54 state-enforcement state-law |
Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigratio… |
20.0 |
| 19-963 |
Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer and White Sales, Inc. |
Fifth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (9)Relisted (2) |
appellate-conflict arbitrability arbitration-agreement civil-procedure contract-interpretation contract-law delegation-doctrine federal-arbitration-act federal-courts questions-of-arbitrability state-courts |
Whether a provision in an arbitration agreement that exempts certain claims from arbitration negates an otherwise clear and unmistakable delegation of… |
20.0 |
| 18-913 |
Joshua Brennan v. James Dawson, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (9) |
civil-liability civil-procedure civil-rights common-law constitutional-rights due-process law-enforcement liability police-conduct qualified-immunity reasonable-reliance |
Whether a police officer may reasonably rely on a narrow exception to a specific and clearly established right to shield him from civil liability when… |
19.5 |
| 19-897 |
Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al. v. Maria Angelica Guzman Chavez, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (7)Relisted (2) |
8-usc-1226 8-usc-1231 administrative-law detention immigration-detention immigration-law immigration-procedure removal-order statutory-interpretation withholding-of-removal withholding-removal |
Whether the detention of an alien who is subject to a reinstated removal order and who is pursuing withholding or deferral of removal is governed by 8… |
18.0 |
| 18-843 |
Ivan Pena, et al. v. Martin Horan, Director, California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (7) |
2nd-amendment civil-rights due-process equal-protection firearm-regulation firearm-restrictions handgun-regulation intermediate-scrutiny microstamping second-amendment self-defense standing takings |
California's "Unsafe Handgun Act," Cal. Penal Code § 31900 et seq., violates the Second Amendment by banning handguns of the kind in common use for tr… |
17.5 |
| 19-679 |
Amy Corbitt v. Michael Vickers |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (6) |
burden-of-proof civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process excessive-force interlocutory-appeal law-enforcement pleading-requirement pleading-standards police-use-of-force qualified-immunity section-1983 use-of-force |
1) Whether qualified immunity is an affirmative defense (placing the burden on the defendant to raise and prove it) or whether it is a pleading requir… |
17.0 |
| 18-1287 |
Alexander L. Baxter v. Brad Bracey, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (11) |
4th-amendment civil-rights due-process excessive-force police-misconduct police-use-of-force qualified-immunity search-and-seizure seizure |
1. Does binding authority holding that a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment when he uses a police dog to apprehend a suspect who has surrend… |
16.5 |
| 19-1010 |
Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., et al. v. Connecticut, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (6) |
civil-procedure civil-procedure-discovery claw-back discovery discovery-scope document-production federal-rules-of-civil-procedure mandamus mandamus-review proportionality relevance relevance-standard rule-26 scope-of-discovery |
Whether, contrary to Rule 26(b), this Court's decisions, and the decisions of five circuits, a district court may compel a party that has not engaged … |
16.5 |
| 19-656 |
William Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (6) |
circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process emergency-responders first-responders hypothermia hypothermia-treatment qualified-immunity state-created-danger |
The Fourteenth Amendment provides that the government may not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny t… |
16.0 |
| 19-899 |
Shaniz West v. Doug Winfield, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Relisted (6) |
4th-amendment civil-rights consent due-process excessive-force fourth-amendment law-enforcement property-damage property-rights qualified-immunity |
Whether an officer who has consent to "get inside"
a house but instead destroys it from the outside is entitled to qualified immunity in the absence o… |
16.0 |
| 19-404 |
David Seth Worman, et al. v. Maura T. Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (7)Relisted (7) |
2nd-amendment caetano civil-rights due-process firearms-ban heller heller-standard individual-right intermediate-scrutiny mcdonald second-amendment self-defense |
Does Massachusetts' ban unconstitutionally infringe the individual right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment? |
15.5 |
| 19-839 |
Eastern Oregon Mining Association, et al. v. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, et al. |
Oregon |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split clean-water-act environmental-regulation material-movement navigable-waters pollutant-discharge pollution-prohibition statutory-interpretation suction-dredge-mining |
The Clean Water Act forbids the unpermitted "addition of any pollutant to navigable waters," 33 U.S.C. § 1362(12) (emphasis added). See id. § 1311(a).… |
15.0 |
| 19-966 |
Emerson Electric Co. v. SIPCO, LLC |
Federal Circuit |
GVR |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-101 35-usc-103 35-usc-324 administrative-law america-invents-act cbm-patent covered-business-method judicial-review patent patent-review patent-trial-and-appeal-board statutory-interpretation |
In the America Invents Act, Congress authorized the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to review whether certain patents, called Covered Business Method (C… |
14.0 |
| 18-1272 |
Michael Gould, et al. v. Andrew Lipson, in His Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (7) |
2nd-amendment circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process firearm-restrictions good-reason intermediate-scrutiny right-to-bear-arms right-to-carry second-amendment self-defense standing takings |
In District of Columbia v. Heller, this Court held that the Second Amendment protects "the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of co… |
13.5 |
| 19-1141 |
Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, et al. v. BP P.L.C., et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
circuit-split commodity-exchange-act domestic-transaction extraterritorial-jurisdiction location-of-exchange morrison-test morrison-v-national-australia-bank securities-exchange-act stoyas-v-toshiba-corp territorial-application |
In Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 259-60 (2010), this Court severely criticized the Second Circuit's so-called "conduct-and-… |
13.5 |
| 18-1078 |
James Dawson, et al. v. Joshua Brennan |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (9) |
4th-amendment circuit-split curtilage fourth-amendment law-enforcement probation probation-condition probation-conditions search-and-seizure sixth-circuit |
Did the Sixth Circuit misapply this Court's authority and create a conflict among Circuits by holding that a law enforcement officer violates the Four… |
12.5 |
| 19-1061 |
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al. v. Eli Lilly and Company |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
claim-amendment doctrine-of-equivalents festo-corp-v-shoketsu festo-corp-v-shoketsu-kinzoku-kogyo-kabushiki-co patent-claim patent-infringement patent-law patent-law-doctrine-of-equivalents patent-prosecution prosecution-history-estoppel tangential-exception |
Under patent law's "doctrine of equivalents," a patent holder can allege infringement even when the defendant does not literally practice every elemen… |
12.5 |
| 19-1191 |
Ohio v. Shawn Ford |
Ohio |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
atkins-standard atkins-v-virginia civil-rights constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment intellectual-disability standing state-standards supreme-court-jurisdiction supreme-court-precedent |
What is the test for determining whether someone is "intellectually disabled" for purposes of the Eighth Amendment? |
12.5 |
| 19-753 |
Michael Hunter, et al. v. Randy Cole, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (7) |
civil-rights clearly-established-law deadly-force deadly-weapon due-process dynamic-encounter excessive-force fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment police-use-of-force qualified-immunity shooting-encounter use-of-force |
I. If the barrel of a gun is not yet pointed directly at an officer, does clearly established federal law prohibit police officers from firing to stop… |
12.5 |
| 19-1080 |
Archer and White Sales, Inc. v. Henry Schein, Inc. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
arbitrability arbitration-agreement carve-out court-determination delegation equitable-estoppel nonsignatory |
Whether an arbitration agreement that makes no mention of delegation "clearly and unmistakably" delegates arbitrability with respect to actions that t… |
12.0 |
| 19-114 |
Douglas F. Ciolek v. New Jersey |
New Jersey |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (8) |
2nd-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process handgun-carry justifiable-need permit-requirement permit-restriction public-carry public-safety second-amendment self-defense standing takings |
In order to obtain a permit to carry a handgun in the public, the State of New Jersey requires a showing of "justifiable need" which, as defined, does… |
12.0 |
| 19-1058 |
Hospira, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
claim-drafting claim-narrowing doctrine-of-equivalents literal-infringement patent-claim-interpretation patent-claims patent-prosecution-estoppel patent-prosecution-history-estoppel patent-scope prior-art-rejection tangential-relation tangential-relation-exception |
Whether a patentee may recapture subject matter via the doctrine of equivalents under the "tangential relation" exception by arguing that it surrender… |
11.5 |
| 19-757 |
Arizona Libertarian Party, et al. v. Katie Hobbs, Arizona Secretary of State |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
ballot-access ballot-qualified-party candidate-qualification constitutional-threshold election-law independent-voters political-parties primary-election voter-eligibility voter-support |
1. May a state require that a candidate seeking to run in the primary election of a ballot-qualified party demonstrate support from as much as 30 perc… |
11.0 |
| 19-1033 |
Daniel Enrique Cantú v. James M. Moody, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
bivens bivens-claim civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process evidence-fabrication fabricated-evidence federal-officer qualified-immunity standing |
The question presented is whether a plaintiff may pursue a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.… |
10.5 |
| 19-1105 |
Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden v. Jimmy Dean Harris |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
death-penalty death-penalty-appeal deference-to-state-courts deferential-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel intellectual-disability standard-of-review |
1. In holding that the OCCA made an "unreasonable determination of the facts," did the Tenth Circuit contravene this Court's repeated admonition that … |
10.5 |
| 19-487 |
Kevin W. Culp, et al. v. Kwame Raoul, Attorney General of Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (7) |
2nd-amendment concealed-carry constitutional-interpretation due-process equal-protection firearm-rights illinois non-resident-licensing second-amendment standing state-restrictions |
Whether the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms requires that the State of Illinois allow qualified non-residents to apply for an Illinois co… |
9.5 |
| 19-704 |
Matthew D. Wilson, et al. v. Cook County, Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (7) |
2nd-amendment civil-rights common-use common-use-test due-process firearms-regulation heller heller-precedent local-government-restriction second-amendment self-defense standing takings |
This Court has held that the Second Amendment
"guarantee[s] the individual right to possess and carry
weapons in case of confrontation." District of C… |
9.5 |
| 19-1065 |
Teresa Ann Johnson v. Alaska |
Alaska |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
confrontation-clause criminal-procedure expert-testimony forensic-evidence lab-report sixth-amendment surrogate-expert testimonial-evidence |
1. Whether the Confrontation Clause prohibits
the prosecution from introducing into evidence at trial
a certified lab report reflecting statements of
… |
9.0 |
| 18-9674 |
Terence Tramaine Andrus v. Texas |
Texas |
GVR |
Amici (1)Relisted (24)IFP |
death-penalty due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington |
Does the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. Washington, fail to protect the Sixth Amendment r… |
8.0 |
| 19-970 |
Retail Ready Career Center, Inc. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
5th-amendment civil-forfeiture constitutional-counterclaims due-process fifth-amendment in-rem in-rem-proceeding seizure-of-funds sovereign-immunity |
1. Does the United States have complete immunity from constitutional counterclaims asserted in an in rem civil forfeiture case initiated by the United… |
6.5 |
| 19-1206 |
Paul Boland, as Heir of the Estate of Dixie L. Boland, et al. v. Chris Boland, et al. |
Montana |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights discovery discovery-rights due-process estate-dispute hearing probate probate-law standing |
1) Were Petitioners denied due process of the law
when their motion in probate court to turn over
assets belonging to their father's estate was
denied… |
5.5 |
| 19-1207 |
Geoffrey M. Young v. Denise G. Clayton, Chief Judge, Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Kentucky |
Denied |
|
ballot-access ballot-challenge due-process election-law federalism judicial-review kentucky-supreme-court original-jurisdiction separation-of-powers standing state-constitution state-constitution-interpretation statutory-interpretation |
1) Whether the Supreme Court of Kentucky
may nullify Kentucky's ballot challenge statute,
Kentucky Revised Statute ("KRS ") 118.176, and
violate Secti… |
5.5 |
| 19-1217 |
Scottie A. Bagi, et al. v. City of Parma, Ohio |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
|
42-usc-1988 attorney-fees christiansburg-garment civil-rights discretionary-standard due-process first-amendment free-speech public-employee retaliation retaliation-claim summary-judgment |
Whether the District Court abused its discretion in its application of the standards set forth in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412 (19… |
5.5 |
| 19M141 |
Arturo Fernando Shaw Gutierrez v. California |
California |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M142 |
Faramarz Mehdipour v. Lisa Denwalt-Hammond, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19-1127 |
Wheeler K. Neff v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
business-ownership civil-lawsuit mail-fraud money-or-property rico-conspiracy settlement-negotiations tribal-sovereign-immunity unlawful-debt wire-fraud |
1. Does a misrepresentation about the true identity of the owner of a business during settlement negotiations to resolve a civil lawsuit constitute a … |
4.0 |
| 19-6858 |
David Lamont Liddell v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
aggravated-assault armed-career-criminal-act armed-robbery constitutional-law criminal-procedure johnson-precedent johnson-v-united-states mississippi-state-law prior-conviction resentencing section-2255 sentencing statutory-interpretation violent-felony |
Whether, under the law established by this Court in Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015), Mr. Liddell should be resentenced without applyin… |
4.0 |
| 19-1215 |
Steven Sussex, et ux. v. City of Tempe, Arizona |
Arizona |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure enabling-act federal-defense federal-enabling-act federal-law federal-preemption judicial-procedure jurisdiction property-rights quiet-title state-law |
In a quiet title proceeding, can the trial court apply state law to bar a defense that the plaintiff's title is "null and void" under the federal Ariz… |
3.5 |
| 19-1282 |
Avery Terry v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
18-usc-924c appeal-waiver constitutional-vagueness crime-of-violence criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-appeal-waiver due-process force-clause hobbs-act hobbs-act-robbery residual-clause sentencing statutory-interpretation unconstitutional-vagueness vagueness-doctrine violent-crime |
WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DISMISSING THE APPEAL PURSUANT TO AN INVALID APPEAL WAIVER, AFTER MAKING ERRONEOUS FINDINGS, OVERLOOKING AND MIS… |
3.5 |
| 19-1294 |
Geoffrey Young v. Amy McGrath |
Kentucky |
Denied |
Response Waived |
ballot-access ballot-challenge civil-procedure constitutional-interpretation democratic-party due-process election-integrity election-law judicial-procedure kentucky-constitution political-parties primary-election standing |
1) Whether Kentucky's Judicial Department
unlawfully enabled the names of Amy McGrath and
Andy Beshear, who were shown by a preponderance
of the evide… |
3.5 |
| 19-1295 |
Rao S. Mandalapu v. Temple University Hospital, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1981 civil-rights civil-rights-act employment-discrimination pretext reeves-v-sanderson retaliation summary-judgment title-vii |
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2-3) and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C. § 1981) prevent discrimination and reta… |
3.5 |
| 19-1297 |
James K. Collins, et ux. v. D.R. Horton-Texas, Ltd. |
Texas |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment due-process federal-judgment fourteenth-amendment personal-jurisdiction sovereign-immunity state-rights takings tenth-amendment void-judgment |
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment allows a state to enforce a void federal judgment obtained without personal jurisdiction over and notice to the defen… |
3.5 |
| 19-7188 |
John Jay Powers v. M. L. Stancil |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-3584 18-usc-3584a administrative-deference administrative-law bureau-of-prisons criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing deference federal-bureau-of-prisons federal-courts federal-sentencing sentencing-interpretation statutory-ambiguity statutory-interpretation |
FOR THE FIRST TIME IN ANY OF THE CIRCUITS, THE TENTH CIRCUIT HELD THE LANGUAGE OF 18 U.S.C. 3584(a)'S PHRASE "AT THE SAME TIME" TO BE AMBIGUOUS. THE T… |
-1.0 |
| 19-8036 |
Odis Lee Jackson v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
criminal-justice-reform criminal-resentencing district-court-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction first-step-act judicial-review mandatory-minimum post-sentencing-conduct sentencing sentencing-modification sentencing-reform statutory-interpretation |
I. What procedures does Section 404 of the First Step Act require a district court to follow when conducting its statutorily required "complete review… |
-1.0 |
| 19-7790 |
Brenda Mason, Individually and on Behalf of Quamaine Dwayne Mason, et vir v. Martin Faul |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (6)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process excessive-force fifth-circuit objective-reasonableness police-misconduct qualified-immunity standing use-of-force |
This case involves the use of excessive force by a police officer that was determined by a jury to be "objectively unreasonable" but nonetheless resul… |
-2.0 |
| 19-7670 |
Hooman Ashkan Panah v. Ron Broomfield, Warden |
California |
Denied |
Amici (2)IFP |
circuit-split criminal-conviction due-process federal-law habeas invalidated-evidence judicial-review post-conviction scientific-evidence trial |
What is the test to determine when due process is violated based on scientific evidence presented at trial which is later shown to be invalid? |
-2.5 |
| 19-7300 |
Billy J. Booker v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction sentencing standing statutory-provisions |
DOES A MNLLY HALDULELT MANLNACULED IDITMENT COLPEL CREMIHAL JURISDICTIDLL BL A STAE MIAL CUAT.
(Q)OOES A COUICTIOLUUDER A FAUDLLELTT LUDICTMEITT BINI… |
-4.0 |
| 19-7642 |
Ann Karnofel v. Superior Waterproofing, Inc. |
Ohio |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection exculpatory-evidence federal-evidence judicial-review jurisdiction lower-court standing |
Were Petitioner's due process rights denied, since she is a 97-year-old, female, PRO SE litigant?
Did Petitioner receive a fair day in court? |
-4.0 |
| 19-7919 |
Darius Latrell King v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
GVR |
IFP |
18-usc-922(g) 9th-circuit-appeal bench-trial felon-in-possession knowledge-requirement prohibited-status stipulated-facts |
1. Mr. King was found guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm after a stipulated facts bench trial where the only stipulated fact related t… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8200 |
Don Farley v. Carl Parson |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidence evidence-exclusion first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech witness-testimony |
1. Was Farley denied his First Amendment Right of Free Speech and Fourteenth Amendment of due process?
2. Did the U.S. District Court fail to exercis… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8216 |
Scott Winfield Davis v. Shay Hatcher, Warden |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment arizona-v-youngblood bad-faith circuit-split due-process exculpatory-evidence fourteenth-amendment youngblood-standard |
This is the case for the Court to critically re-examine lost evidence and "bad faith" under Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (1988) because in appli… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8223 |
Timothy W. Connors v. Jerry Howell, Warden, et al. |
Nevada |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus prisoner-rights standing |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-8224 |
James William Neuman v. Nathan Callahan, et al. |
Iowa |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights clerk-conspiracy court-records document-tampering due-process fraud fraud-allegations judicial-misconduct qualified-immunity retaliation theft |
1. Do the Black Hawk County Clerks have qualified
Immunity when they conspired to delete or erase a
200 dollar payment to the clerk's office under
rec… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8230 |
Alexander Kates v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts due-process fourth-amendment illegal-seizure ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement property-return prosecutorial-misconduct retroactivity |
Whether a plea agreement to return illegally seized property in exchange for a guilty plea, induced by the prosecutor, is breached when the prosecutio… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8233 |
Reynaldo Alberto Cantu v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
bias constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial impartial-jury judicial-bias juror-misconduct remand trial-procedure |
Whether The Texas High Court Error, denying Petitioner the Right to a "fair and impartial trial" failing to Remand Case back to the trial court, after… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8234 |
Eric J. Davis v. LaShann Eppinger, Warden |
Ohio |
Denied |
IFP |
conviction court-jurisdiction criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction legal-finality petition-construction standing subject-matter-jurisdiction void-judgment |
(1) Whether there can be a finality of judgement of conviction rendered against a criminal defendant, where the criminal court lacked Subject Matter j… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8236 |
Iva Brooks v. Aaron Foster |
Illinois |
Denied |
IFP |
child-support civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-discretion parental-rights pro-se procedural-violations standing state-attorney |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-8238 |
Morris Kent Thompson v. Jennifer Leppek Cerato, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Natalie A. Richards-Thompson |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-override due-process equal-protection government-misconduct judicial-oversight judicial-procedure legal-conspiracy separation-of-powers |
1. Have the attorney's and court committed a management override of the Constitution?
2. When fraud and attorney misconduct is present is the court r… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8241 |
Joseph Llewellyn Worrell v. Emigrant Mortgage Company, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
bankruptcy bankruptcy-stay civil-rights due-process foreclosure foreclosure-proceedings mortgage-security preemption servicemembers-civil-relief-act summary-judgment |
Whether a mortgage security instrument created six days before the underlying promissory note is sufficiently executed provides sufficient standing to… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8243 |
Jonathan Melvin LeDeux v. Jeannette Louise Anthony, as an Individual and in her Official Capacity as Trustee of The Emmett and Aralee Charlton Trust, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure due-process fraud fraud-vitiation judicial-error noerr-pennington-doctrine probate probate-clause separation-of-powers |
1. Can Juridically created rules such as, The Probate Clause and the Noerr Pennington Doctrine, ect. Interfere with due process without also violating… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8244 |
Frank Morgan v. Illinois Department of Corrections |
Illinois |
Denied |
IFP |
chaplain-duties civil-liberties civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-protections detainee-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment religious-services standing takings |
1. Whothere the Illissis Dopnatnout ot
COLNELTION'S HAS HUTHONITY TO CHANBO
Qocumers
Promalquted by THe IiGOOONA/ ASSEblY
N01S
2y 21607
Body?
THO DinO… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8247 |
John Wilson v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
competency-hearing criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process judicial-procedure mental-competency self-representation sixth-amendment trial-court trial-court-discretion |
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT WAS OBLIGATED
TO DETERMINE THE MENTAL COMPETENCY OF
A DEFENDANT BEFORE GRANTING HIM THE
RIGHT TO REPRESENT HIMSELF AT TRIAL IF… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8253 |
Rudolph Churchill v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence hypothetical-question ineffective-assistance jury-instruction jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment trial-counsel |
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL (TRIAL COUNSEL)
*FAILING TO REQUEST THAT THE JURY BE CHARGED WITH RESPECT
… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8257 |
Eric C. Miller v. Randy Gibbs, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence aedpa aedpa-requirements due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus procedural-default successive-petitions supreme-court-precedent time-barred-petition |
Can the lower courts continue to bypass U.S. Supreme Court law in favor of their self-created rule calling time-barred initial habeas petitions 'adjud… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8259 |
Talib Hussain v. Marietta Halal Meat, et al. |
Georgia |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eviction eviction-procedure georgia-statutes judicial-discretion landlord-tenant landlord-tenant-law property-rights |
Due process of law and great Importance of public interest
Can a landlord in State of Georgia evict his tenant without dispossesry notice and without… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8260 |
Alvin Fulton v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ex-post-facto fundamental-miscarriage judicial-discretion post-release-supervision sentencing sentencing-error sex-offenses |
1. the usages and principles of law Whether the State of New York Court of Appeals has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts w… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8266 |
James Heard v. Illinois |
Illinois |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review circuit-court-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion pro-se-representation right-to-counsel self-representation trial-court |
1. Whether the trial court erred in denying James Heard's pre-trial motion to proceed pro Se?
2. Whether the appellate court unreosonably applied the… |
-4.5 |
| 19-8536 |
In Re Robert P. Russell |
|
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure due-process federal-constitutional-right federal-crime federal-habeas habeas-corpus liberty-interest liberty-interests murder-conviction retroactive-application statutory-interpretation successive-motions |
Whether Petitioner Robert Peter Russell ("Russell"), convicted of first degree murder under 18
U.S.C. Section 1, retains a federal constitutional righ… |
-4.5 |
| 19-7732 |
Jerad Hanks v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (4)IFP |
bank-robbery circuit-court-conflict circuit-court-split constitutional-interpretation crime-of-violence criminal-law criminal-statute due-process elements-clause federal-bank-robbery federal-statutes firearm-use rule-of-lenity use-of-force vagueness-doctrine |
I. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), which criminalizes the use of a firearm during a "crime of violence," in this case, the federal bank robbery statute… |
-5.0 |
| 19-6593 |
Deshay D. Ford v. Timothy P. White, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
42-usc-1981 access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech racial-discrimination |
1. Violation of the Petitioner's Constitutional and Civil Rights
to prevent the Petitioner from filing a law suit against the
Respondent (s) which w… |
-5.5 |
| 19-6444 |
Jermaine D. Harris v. Stephen T. Moyer, Secretary, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
aiding-and-abetting appeal cell-phone-technology cell-tower-testimony criminal-procedure cumulative-effect due-process fifth-amendment fifth-amendment-privilege habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance legally-inconsistent-verdicts sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington |
1) Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of
appealability on Petitioner 's claim that his trial counsel
was constitutionally ineffec… |
-6.0 |
| 19-7495 |
Abu Ala M. D. Badruddoza v. Department of Homeland Security, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law civil-rights covid-19 due-process employment equal-protection osha standing statutory-authority takings vaccination workplace-safety |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 19-7538 |
Victoria Carlson, et vir v. Jodi Harpstead, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al. |
Minnesota |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-procedure administrative-procedures breast-cancer-treatment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-statute medicaid medicaid-coverage medical-assistance medicare state-statute statutory-interpretation |
1) Whether the applicable "plain and unambiguous " language in light of Hauser v.
IdahoDWP and of Congress 's federal statute 42 U.S.C. 1396a(aa) and… |
-6.0 |
| 19-7669 |
Lawrence Eliot Mattison v. Janie Deborah Willis, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-13 38-cfr-814 38-cfr-814-560-561 concurrent-criminal-jurisdiction concurrent-jurisdiction criminal-jurisdiction federal-criminal-jurisdiction federal-enclave federal-enclave-jurisdiction jurisdiction-transfer retrocession stalking state-criminal-prosecution state-prosecution veterans-affairs |
Whether repeal of code of Virginia §7.1-21(1976) of jurisdiction over alleged crimes and offenses committed on federal enclave property, and acceptanc… |
-6.0 |
| 19-8010 |
Joseph Chhim v. City of Houston, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-procedure burden-of-proof civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination hiring-process job-referral performance-review pre-qualification prequalification termination |
1. Whether Appellant was discriminated against in the initial pre
qualification process when he was qualified for the position of custodian
and build… |
-6.0 |
| 19-8242 |
Adrian Weatherspoon v. Fatemah Bagahpour, et al. |
Tennessee |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure due-process eviction eviction-procedure foreclosure judicial-signature mortgage-dispute property-rights standing |
SHERIFF NOT REALIZING WRIT OF DOCUMENT WAS NOT SIGNED
We would want to ask why Mr. Vincent Brooks(respondent) would declare the writ of possession doc… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8271 |
Loren J. Larson, Jr. v. Alaska |
Alaska |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
equal-protection impartial-jury juror-bias jury-trial jury-trial-right no-impeachment-rule racial-bias sixth-amendment |
All states and the federal government have one version or another of an evidence rule that generally prohibits the introduction of juror testimony reg… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8290 |
Robert Taylor v. Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-procedure appellate-review circuit-court-discretion civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process evidence-standard federal-rules-of-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-procedure procedural-due-process standing |
1. Did The Circuit Court Abuse Its Discretion?
2. Was There a Violation Of Procedural Due Process?
3. Was There a Disregard For Substantive Evidence… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8318 |
William Whiteley v. John Willis, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
automobile-exception certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure evidence-law exculpatory-evidence eyewitness fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel search-and-seizure warrantless-search |
Whether petitioner is entitled to a certificate of appealability on his claim that the warrantless search of his automobile's glove compartment violat… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8389 |
Edward Yarbrough, Jr. v. J. Sullivan, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bill-of-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-error federal-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure plain-error prosecutorial-misconduct remarks-authentication reversible-error trial-court |
1. Whether a prosecutor's uninvited inflammatory remarks made
in summation, absent a timely/explicit curative instruction,
so infected the trial with … |
-6.5 |
| 19-8439 |
Marijan Cvjeticanin v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-violation catch-me-if-you-can criminal-procedure due-process kyles-standard kyles-v-whitley materiality-standard new-trial-motion perjury rule-33 trial-perjury |
1) BRADY VIOLATIONS - "CATCH ME IF YOU CAN" - When, in direct violation of the
district court's specific discovery order, the Government fails to turn… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8449 |
Gregory Harris, Jr. v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split criminal-prosecution evidentiary-standards federal-rules-of-evidence helpfulness law-enforcement-witnesses lay-opinion-testimony personal-perception usurping-jury-role |
The Third Circuit panel majority, deepening a mature circuit split regarding the foundational requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 701, ruled that… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8456 |
Thomas Hopes v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split essential-elements evidence-standard federal-rules-of-evidence helpfulness law-enforcement-witnesses lay-opinion-testimony personal-perception rule-701 usurping-jury-role |
The Third Circuit panel majority, deepening a mature circuit split regarding the foundational requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 701, ruled that… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8466 |
Branch William Niehouse v. Brigitte Amsberry |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-law evidence force legal-sufficiency lost-and-found property-rights robbery robbery-evidence speculative-testimony trespass trespassing use-of-force |
Would reasonable jurists debate whether the evidence of robbery was legally sufficient when the only evidence that Mr. Niehouse's threatened use of fo… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8470 |
Raymond K. Walker v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-right counsel-refusal court-order due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance judicial-review procedural-default right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
1. Refusal of Price Counsel to Comply TUS XC.5
Continual request asad Couch orders bo file
aaa tbiduvik telttiag ollesabtons of imeQte
ecdiveness c… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8478 |
John King v. United States |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
alleyne-v-united-states criminal-procedure fact-finding judicial-discretion jury-determination jury-fact-finding mcmillan-v-pennsylvania preponderance-of-the-evidence preponderance-standard sentencing sentencing-enhancement united-states-v-watts |
I. BY A JURY TO ENHANCE A SENTENCE?
AFTER THIS COURT'S DECISION IN UNITED STATES V. ALLEYNE, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), NON-CONTROLLING, CAN THE PREPONDERAN… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8479 |
Bernard J. Fleming v. United States |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
closing-arguments criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial personal-opinion prosecutorial-misconduct prosecutorial-vouching vouching witness-credibility |
When do comments by a prosecutor in her final and rebuttal arguments to the jury in a criminal case that affirm the veracity of the government's chief… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8485 |
Melvin T. Bell v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law constitutional-violation criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process final-judgment judicial-review jurisdiction legal-remedy statutory-interpretation |
WHEN A PETITIONER HAS REALIZED, TWO YEARS LATER, AND UNCONSTITUTIONALLY RETRIED FOR THE SAME STATUTORY OFFENSE TO IN THE SAME PROCEEDING, WHICH HAS LE… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8486 |
Quincy Tremayne Bloodworth v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights fourth-amendment law-enforcement marijuana-legalization police-encounter probable-cause search-and-seizure standard-of-review unreasonable-seizures |
Are immunities provided and protected against seizures? Poor people from when certain seizures are prolonged to rely
Does the Fourth Amendment of the… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8489 |
Jason Mitchell Abbo v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
acca acca-enhancement burden-of-proof criminal-justice due-process equal-protection juvenile-conviction predicate-offense sentencing sentencing-enhancement |
#1. Does a Juvenile Conviction for "Possession" of a controlled substance qualify as a prior predicate conviction for an ACCA enhancement when 18 U.S.… |
-6.5 |
| 19-8494 |
Michael Lustig v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment fruit-of-poisonous-tree fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree illegal-search search-and-seizure standing |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 19-8500 |
David Furtado Gray v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing takings |
Whether the term "pattern of Racketeering Activity" as defined in 18 U.S.C.D. 1959(a), which cross references to 18 U.S.C.S. 1961, proved more of simp… |
-6.5 |