1) Were Petitioners denied due process of the law
when their motion in probate court to turn over
assets belonging to their father's estate was
denied without a hearing after Petitioners
specifically requested a hearing and while
discovery was in process (motion to compel
outstanding) and when the state supreme court
affirmed the district court's denial of a hearing?
In other words, is a hearing required when a
personal representative or heir seeks turnover
of assets to an estate in a probate proceeding
and is denial of such a hearing when material
facts are at issue a violation of the petitioner's
rights under the due process clause of the 14
Amendment of the Constitution of the United
States.

2) Does Due Process of Law under the 14%
Amendment require some minimal discovery
requested in a civil case where material facts are
disputed?

Were Petitioners denied due process