No. 19-679
Amy Corbitt v. Michael Vickers
Tags: burden-of-proof civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process excessive-force interlocutory-appeal law-enforcement pleading-requirement pleading-standards police-use-of-force qualified-immunity section-1983 use-of-force
Latest Conference:
2020-06-11
(distributed 6 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Whether qualified immunity is an affirmative defense (placing the burden on the defendant to raise and prove it) or whether it is a pleading requirement (placing the burden on a plaintiff to plead its absence).
2) Whether the Court should recalibrate or reverse the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether qualified immunity is an affirmative defense or a pleading requirement
Docket Entries
2020-06-15
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
2020-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-05-13
Rescheduled.
2020-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-21
Reply of petitioner Amy Corbitt filed.
2020-04-03
Brief of respondent Michael Vickers in opposition filed.
2020-02-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 8, 2020.
2020-02-20
Reply in support of motion filed.
2020-02-19
Response to motion from petitioner Amy Corbitt filed.
2020-02-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 9, 2020 to April 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 9, 2020.
2020-01-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 7, 2020 to March 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-08
Response Requested. (Due February 7, 2020)
2019-12-20
Brief amici curiae of Cross-Ideological Groups Dedicated to Ensuring Official Accountability, Restoring the Public's Trust in Law Enforcement, and Promoting the Rule of Law filed. (Distributed)
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-06
Waiver of right of respondent Michael Vickers to respond filed.
2019-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)
2019-09-20
Application (19A309) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 6, 2019.
2019-09-16
Application (19A309) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 8, 2019 to December 6, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Amy Corbitt
Paul Whitfield Hughes — McDermott Will & Emery, Petitioner
Cross-Ideological Groups Dedicated to Ensuring Official Accountability, Restoring the Public's Trust in Law Enforcement, and Promoting the Rule of Law
Jay Remington Schweikert — The Cato Institute, Amicus
Michael Vickers
Richard Keith Strickland — Brown, Readdick,et al., Respondent