(1) Whether there can be a finality of judgement of conviction rendered against a criminal defendant, where the criminal court lacked Subject Matter jurisdiction to render the judgment of conviction against the criminal defendant?.

(2) Should this court liberally construe this present petition as a request under Goneck v. Pan Am World Airways Inc.. 382 U.S. 25 (1965) and grant relief where Eric Davis stands aione not receiving relief from a void judgment of conviction ?.

(3) Where a lack of subject matter jurisdictoncclaim was totally disregarded and misinterpreted, or not interpreted by The Ohio Supreme Court, coming to it's own :co,ncluioh or non-concluion.;.of this Court The U.S. Supreme Court .decision ?.

Whether there can be a finality of judgement of conviction rendered against a criminal defendant, where the criminal court lacked subject-matter-jurisdiction