1. Whether the Confrontation Clause prohibits
the prosecution from introducing into evidence at trial
a certified lab report reflecting statements of
nontestifying analysts through a surrogate expert
who, although a supervisor at the lab, merely
reviewed the report and results and did not conduct or
observe any of the underlying tests; and

2. Whether the Confrontation Clause prohibits
the surrogate expert from testifying at trial about the
underlying tests, including the particular samples
tested, procedures followed, and results reached.

Whether the Confrontation Clause prohibits the prosecution from introducing into evidence at trial a certified lab report reflecting statements of nontestifying analysts through a surrogate expert