No. 19-8036
Odis Lee Jackson v. United States
Tags: criminal-justice-reform criminal-resentencing district-court-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction first-step-act judicial-review mandatory-minimum post-sentencing-conduct sentencing sentencing-modification sentencing-reform statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-06-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. What procedures does Section 404 of the First Step Act require a district court to follow when conducting its statutorily required "complete review of the motion on the merits"?
II. Does the First Step Act authorize a court to "impose" a reduced sentence in accordance with such statutes as 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a) and 3582(a), or does it only authorize a court to "modify" a sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What procedures does Section 404 of the First Step Act require a district court to follow when conducting its statutorily required 'complete review of the motion on the merits'?
Docket Entries
2020-06-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
2020-05-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2020)
Attorneys
AUSA
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Odis Jackson
Kathryn Shephard — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner