Immigration
1. Whether the trial court erred in denying James Heard's pre-trial motion to proceed pro Se?
2. Whether the appellate court unreosonably applied the United states Supreme court's holding in Faveta v California 422 US 806 835 (8975> in Finding that Mr. Heard was not denied his Constitutional rignt to proceed pro se?
3. Nnether Mr.Heard was denied his constitutional right to proceed pro se in trial court?
4. whether the appellate court and the People ofthe Starte of Illinois improperly applicd the Beez case as. being instructive in Heavd's case. Baez 241 11l 2d at 65-68:
5. Whether the trial court foiled to properly admonish Mr.Heard before denying him his constitutionolright to procexd pro se?
6. Whether the circuit court rule on Mr. Heard's request 4o proceed pro se?
Whether the trial court erred in denying Somes Heard's pre-trial motion to proceed pro se