| 25A444 |
Bernard Kentrell Breeland, Jr. v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-10-17 |
Presumed Complete |
|
bruen-framework confrontation-clause criminal-procedure felon-in-possession lay-opinion-testimony second-amendment |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7605 |
Rodrigo Alvarez-Quinonez v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-05-31 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
circuit-court-split federal-rule-of-evidence federal-rules-of-evidence harmless-error jury-factfinding-role law-enforcement-witness law-enforcement-witnesses lay-opinion-testimony percipient-knowledge witness-testimony |
May a law enforcement agent give lay opinion testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence
701 based on the agent's overall knowledge of an investigation, … |
| 20-5328 |
Jeffrey Paul Giblin v. Washington |
Washington |
2020-08-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidence-rules eyewitness-testimony intent intent-standard lay-opinion-testimony |
A h FourteenAmenden Contittinauarnts
of "Due Proces ofLaw and"equal protection of the laws"
duly satistied for a Defendant accused of a crime involvin… |
| 19-8456 |
Thomas Hopes v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2020-05-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split essential-elements evidence-standard federal-rules-of-evidence helpfulness law-enforcement-witnesses lay-opinion-testimony personal-perception rule-701 usurping-jury-role |
The Third Circuit panel majority, deepening a mature circuit split regarding the foundational requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 701, ruled that… |
| 19-8449 |
Gregory Harris, Jr. v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2020-05-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split criminal-prosecution evidentiary-standards federal-rules-of-evidence helpfulness law-enforcement-witnesses lay-opinion-testimony personal-perception usurping-jury-role |
The Third Circuit panel majority, deepening a mature circuit split regarding the foundational requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 701, ruled that… |
| 19-7246 |
Keith Harris v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2020-01-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause crawford-rule crawford-v-washington cross-examination hearsay informants law-enforcement-testimony lay-opinion-testimony right-to-counsel sixth-amendment witness-testimony |
whether the admission of law enforcement testimony that goes to whether a defendant was a participant in a conspiracy based on information provided by… |
| 18-6616 |
Maria I. Sanutti-Spencer v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
2018-11-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause criminal-motive criminal-procedure decedent's-drug-addiction decedent's-drug-dealing decedent's-motive decedent's-physical-abuse defendant's-health-issues due-process evidence evidence-exclusion lay-opinion-testimony right-to-complete-defense right-to-present-defense trial-procedure witness-testimony |
Does excluding evidence of another's motive, of the decedent's drug addiction, drug dealing, his physical abuse of the defendant and the defendant's s… |
| 18-5747 |
Javier Amador-Flores v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2018-08-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split criminal-procedure evidence evidence-law expert-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence law-enforcement lay-opinion lay-opinion-testimony lay-testimony specialized-knowledge witness-testimony |
When a law-enforcement agent expressly compares the events in a case to what is typical in other cases he has investigated, is his opinion based on "s… |