No. 19-6593

Deshay D. Ford v. Timothy P. White, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: 42-usc-1981 access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment FifthAmendment Punishment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2020-06-11 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Violation of the Petitioner's Constitutional and Civil Rights
to prevent the Petitioner from filing a law suit against the
Respondent (s) which was purposely driven .
Dr. Gary Kinsey director of Program of Educational
Leadership did not have no black males nor females
on his Administrative staff and no black males and females
Professors on his Doctoral Degree programs as instructors.
Dr. Erica Beck President of Channel Islands University
Did not have any black males nor females on her Administrative
Staff at the University. Both Dr. Kinsey and Dr. Beck encouraged
and maintained white racist supremacy staff.
A. Law Suit against the Respondent (s) were purposely driven
denying the Appellant admissions to a Doctoral Degree Program
Respondents in their administrative positions maintain a polices
denying black men and women opportunities of employment
Violation Petitioner's right to access to the United States district Court B.
Violation of Petitioner's Right of Free Speech under First C.
Amendment under Constitution, and the Petitioner's Right
to petition the Government for a redress of grievance.
Violated Petitioner's Rights to due Process and Equal Protection D.
Under the 14Th. Amendment

E. Violated Petitioner's Rights under 42 U.S.C. : 1981
F. Violation of 42 U.S. C. : 1981 denial of Access to the
The U.S. District Courts.
G. Granting U.S. Judges authority tcrArbitrarily deny Forma Pauperis
without establishing a clear policies and procedures
for U.S. Judges to utilize in denial of forma Pauperis
H. Granting U.S. Judges dictatorial authority to deny access
to the U.S. district Courts by allowing Judges to deny
access to fair and impartial trials to poor, black, brown
disable people by alleging that their complaints are
frivolous , lack good faith, and have no merit, and
no substantial legal questions.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Violation of the Petitioner's Constitutional and Civil Rights to prevent the Petitioner from filing a lawsuit against the Respondent(s)

Docket Entries

2020-06-15
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner GRANTED. The order entered January 13, 2020, is vacated.
2020-06-15
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
2020-02-12
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-01-22
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2020-01-13
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 3, 2020, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-26
Waiver of right of respondents Timothy P. White, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Deshay D. Ford
Deshay D. Ford — Petitioner
Timothy P. White, et al.
Catherine WoodbridgeOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent