pretext-analysis
6 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-623 | Lanlan Li v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC | Seventh Circuit | 2024-12-06 | Denied | americans-with-disabilities-act employment-discrimination essential-job-function interactive-process pretext-analysis summary-judgment | 1. Whether an "essential job function," is a question of fact for the jury. 2. Whether the Seventh Circuit, along with many other circuits, is allowi… | |
| 23-417 | Ron Rutledge v. Board of County Commissioners of Johnson County, Kansas | Tenth Circuit | 2023-10-19 | Denied | circuit-split civil-procedure employment-discrimination evidence honest-belief-defense mcdonnell-douglas mcdonnell-douglas-test pretext-analysis summary-judgment | 1. Does the honest belief defense violate the axiomatic law of summary judgment requiring the evidence and inferences to be viewed in favor of the non… | |
| 22-713 | Shannon Gladden v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC | Eleventh Circuit | 2023-01-31 | Denied | Response Waived | bostock bostock-interpretation but-for but-for-causation circuit-split civil-rights employment-discrimination evidence-evaluation motivating-factor pretext pretext-analysis | 1) Does the but-for reasoning referenced in Bostock apply to McDonnell Douglas pretext analysis?: In the decision below, the Eleventh Circuit appears … |
| 20-1622 | Ramonica M. Luke v. University Health Services, Inc. | Eleventh Circuit | 2021-05-20 | Denied | Response Waived | 42-usc-1981 admissible-evidence civil-rights civil-rights-act comparator-evidence employment-discrimination honest-belief-rule mcdonnell-douglas mcdonnell-douglas-framework pretext-analysis similarly-situated title-vii | 1. Applicable to the Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964 or 42 U.S.C, 1981, did Plaintiff prove pretext by discrimination by showing "weakness, impl… |
| 20-792 | Melinda Beazley Pearson v. City of Augusta, Georgia, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2020-12-11 | Denied | civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination investigation loudermill-hearing neutral-decisionmaker pretext pretext-analysis public-employment summary-judgment | Was it error for the panel to affirm a grant of summary judgment, finding due process had been provided where a challenged demotion had been effected … | |
| 18-634 | Aed El-Saba v. University of South Alabama | Eleventh Circuit | 2018-11-15 | Denied | appellate-review civil-procedure employment-discrimination national-origin-discrimination pretext pretext-analysis retaliation summary-judgment supervisory-power termination | Under Rule 10(a) when the trial court changes the language of the stated discharge reason; substitutes another document as the focus of pretext analys… |