bostock-interpretation
2 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24A539 | Kevin Stitt, Governor of Oklahoma, et al. v. Rowan Fowler, et al. | Tenth Circuit | 2024-12-03 | Presumed Complete | birth-certificate bostock-interpretation equal-protection gender-identity sex-discrimination transgender-rights | Question not identified. | |
| 22-713 | Shannon Gladden v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC | Eleventh Circuit | 2023-01-31 | Denied | Response Waived | bostock bostock-interpretation but-for but-for-causation circuit-split civil-rights employment-discrimination evidence-evaluation motivating-factor pretext pretext-analysis | 1) Does the but-for reasoning referenced in Bostock apply to McDonnell Douglas pretext analysis?: In the decision below, the Eleventh Circuit appears … |