| 25-5979 |
Hubert Arvie v. Cathedral of Faith Missionary Baptist Church, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-10-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights due-process federal-intervention judicial-immunity section-1983 younger-abstention |
Questions have risen out of state and federal court final judgments involving retaliatory,
fraudulent, conspiratorial, and ultra vires acts or omissi… |
| 25-5316 |
Feifei Gu v. Michael Sher, New York City Police Officer, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-08-11 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
abstention-doctrine civil-procedure constitutional-rights federal-intervention judicial-comity state-interests |
In a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 setting, when a federal court is asked to stay the enforcement of a State Court's Order in a civil case initiated by private par… |
| 23A658 |
Pedro Rodriguez v. Jeff Macomber, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-01-17 |
Presumed Complete |
|
aggregate-sentence constitutional-proportionality federal-intervention habeas-review sentencing state-court-discretion |
Question not identified. |
| 21-6957 |
David Kent Thacker, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-01-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
amendment-due-process civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure criminal-proceedings due-process exclusionary-rule federal-intervention investigation-scope miranda-rights pecuniary-interest self-incrimination |
in this particular scenario (pretrial assertions must it have been asserted by way of the 4th Amendments EXCLUSIONARY RULE, to suppress State Statemen… |
| 20-6267 |
In Re Graham Schiff |
|
2020-11-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
bad-faith civil-rights constitutional-rights constitutional-violations criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process federal-intervention post-conviction-relief state-criminal-proceedings state-officials |
Question not identified. |
| 19-5942 |
Wade Lay v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-09-13 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-due-process brown-vs-board civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-principles due-process federal-intervention federalism judicial-review standing state-governance substantive-due-process takings |
I. HAS SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, AS A JUDICIAL DOCTRINE, WITH AMELIORATING STATUTES OVER TIME, SO ALTERED THE VITAL PRINCIPLES OF OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM,… |