| 24-664 |
Joseph Rued v. Catrina Rued |
Minnesota |
2024-12-19 |
Denied |
|
child-custody constitutional-rights due-process judicial-doctrine parental-rights state-court-discretion |
This case implicates fundamental protected rights including custody rights of natural parents. The Minnesota Judiciary has knowingly sustained relianc… |
| 23-7198 |
Ebone East, et al. v. Fix It Auto Repair, Inc. |
Arizona |
2024-04-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals civil-procedure due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech right-to-appeal standing state-court-discretion |
1. ) Does This Federal courts apply standards of review when examining lower court rulings. It refers to the idea of fundamental fairness, that the go… |
| 23A658 |
Pedro Rodriguez v. Jeff Macomber, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-01-17 |
Presumed Complete |
|
aggregate-sentence constitutional-proportionality federal-intervention habeas-review sentencing state-court-discretion |
Question not identified. |
| 22-6589 |
In Re Moses Jackson |
|
2023-01-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-jurisdiction article-iii constitutional-review due-process federal-question judicial-power jurisdiction standing state-court-discretion supreme-court supreme-court-jurisdiction |
Question not identified. |
| 21-1509 |
Ryan Costello v. Carol Ann Carter, et al. |
Pennsylvania |
2022-06-01 |
Denied |
|
2-usc-2a(c) congressional-redistricting constitutional-interpretation elections-clause judicial-remedies legislative-impasse partisan-gerrymandering state-court-discretion state-courts |
Do the Elections Clause and 2 U.S.C. § 2a(c) constrain the remedial discretion of courts when they impose congressional maps in response to a constitu… |
| 21-1116 |
Matthew Liebovich, et al. v. Diane Janice Tobin, et al. |
California |
2022-02-11 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure discretion due-process notice notice-requirement state-court-discretion state-statute supreme-court-precedent void-judgment |
Notice is an "elementary and fundamental requirement of due process," so where a court enters a judgment absent notice, the Due Process Clause demands… |
| 21-95 |
David W. Foley, et ux. v. Orange County, Florida, et al. |
Florida |
2021-07-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 colore-officii fourteenth-amendment legal-remedy public-servant-immunity state-court-discretion statutory-interpretation virtute-officii |
Is a state court free under the Fourteenth Amendment to deprive a plaintiff of a remedy in 42 USC §1983 by granting a public servant immunity from sui… |
| 20-5200 |
Gerald A. Sanford, Sr. v. Tennessee Department of Correction, et al. |
Tennessee |
2020-07-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law appellate-review civil-rights due-process judicial-procedure judicial-proceedings prisoner-rights state-court-discretion state-court-of-appeals statutory-interpretation supervisory-power |
WHETHER A STATE COURT OF APPEALS HAS ENTERED A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH A DECISION OF A UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AND OTHER STATE COURT OF APPEA… |
| 18-5556 |
Joseph D. Barnes v. Jeff Landry, Attorney General of Louisiana |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-08-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bad-acts bad-acts-evidence criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-evidence due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel other-crimes-evidence quadruple-offender speedy-trial state-court-discretion statute-of-limitations |
1. Whether reasonable jurists would have found that the district court denied Mr. Barnes a fair trial when It allowed other crimes evidence and/or bad… |