I. HAS SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, AS A JUDICIAL DOCTRINE, WITH AMELIORATING STATUTES OVER TIME, SO ALTERED THE VITAL PRINCIPLES OF OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM, EMPOWERING THE STATE GOVERNMENTS FROM THEIR PROPER DECENCY?

II. THE INSTRUMENT, CREATE A SYSTEM AS THAT ARTICULATED BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON OR IS: "OBSTACLES TO USURPATION AND THE FACILITIES OF RESISTANCE, AGAINST ALL OF RIGHTS, SO DISTORTED THE COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF THE GOVERNMENT AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED, REMOVING THE ABILITY OF THE STATE GOVERNMENTS PRACTICALLY TO FULFILL THE OBLIGATIONS OF PROTECTIVE FEDERALISM VIOLATING THE ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4 GUARANTEE TO A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT, AS DEFINED BY JAMES MADISON IN FEDERALIST #39.

III. HAS SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS EMPOWERED FEDERAL JUDGES TO A DEGREE, INFLUENCING BUREAUCRATIC OFFICERS (STATE AND FEDERAL), IN A MANNER SIMILAR TO THE LORDS AND NOBLES OF THE EUROPEAN MONARCHS, DISTORTING THEIR LOYALTY FROM THE RULE OF LAW, TO CARRY OUT THE WILL OF THE JUDICATURE, OR PRINCE.

IV. SHOULD THE CERTIORARI POOL, CONTROLLED BY THE CLERKS OF THIS U.S. SUP. CT. BE REORGANIZED, TO PREVENT THE TYPE OF PREJUDICE AND CENSORSHIP

Whether substantive due process as a legal doctrine has been so altered over time that it has distorted the principles of our political system, undermining the integrity of law and resulting in arbitrary and capricious government actions