No. 21-6957
David Kent Thacker, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Tags: amendment-due-process civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure criminal-proceedings due-process exclusionary-rule federal-intervention investigation-scope miranda-rights pecuniary-interest self-incrimination
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
in this particular scenario (pretrial assertions must it have been asserted by way of the 4th Amendments EXCLUSIONARY RULE, to suppress State Statements in violation of well settled principles of the Self-Incriminating clause
2 whether a pecuniary interest, in such alleged St Amendment DwI be asserted at the onset of judicial proceedings regarding illicited Statements.
Did Claim?
F 2 Diagnosis after Trial.
INDIGENCy is still a barrier. regarding Stan reqarding appeal process as is alleged in Entance cecenc todays evolvinq DWI prosecutions.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether MERANDA is part of the 5th Amendment's protection
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2021-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2022)
Attorneys
David Kent Thacker
David Kent Thacker Jr. — Petitioner