In a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 setting, when a federal court is asked to stay the enforcement of a State Court's Order in a civil case initiated by private parties, whether a stringent test should be applied to decide whether the State's interests are negligible or important?

In satisfying such a standard, Do the State's interests need to be legitimate in the first hand to warrant abstention or Do the State's interests override a person's constitutional rights?

Whether a federal court should apply a stringent test to determine the importance of state interests when considering abstention from enforcing a state court order in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil case