rule-37
11 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24A69 | Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Balchem Corporation, et al. | Second Circuit | 2024-07-22 | Presumed Complete | deposition-platform due-process employment-discrimination rule-37 rule-60 rule-72 | Question not identified. | |
| 23-1032 | Gary Topolewski v. URS Holdings, Inc., et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2024-03-19 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-procedure discovery-sanctions due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure inherent-authority ninth-circuit rule-37 sanctions | In Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers, 357 U.S. 197, 209 (1958) ("Societe Internationale") this… |
| 23A698 | Martha Carrascal v. American Airlines, Inc. | Fourth Circuit | 2024-01-29 | Presumed Complete | discovery-sanctions dismissal employment-discrimination judicial-discretion pro-se-litigant rule-37 | Question not identified. | |
| 23-448 | Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, LLC | Utah | 2023-10-27 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2) | appellate-procedure choice-of-law civil-procedure final-judgment interlocutory-appeal jurisdiction mootness rule-37 voluntary-dismissal | 1. Whether an exception to the final judgment rule is valid under U.R.A.P. 5 as the June 9th, 2023 and June 13th, 2023 arose from an improperly di… |
| 22-7497 | Carlos Cantizano v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2023-05-09 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | constitutional-violation criminal-appeal due-process newly-discovered-evidence right-to-counsel rule-33 rule-33-motion rule-37 | On federal criminal appellants first appeal as of right to counsel, may the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals refuse to provide counsel to help reply to … |
| 22-553 | Derek Rodgers v. United Services Automobile Association, aka USAA | Fifth Circuit | 2022-12-16 | Denied | Response Waived | arbitration civil-procedure duty federal-procedure federal-rules rights rule-37 sanctions spoliation-of-evidence witness-coaching | QUESTION 1: Should Arbitrators deciding a Federal case have the duty and right to impose sanctions for violations of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure … |
| 20-7015 | Sabina Leigh Burton v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, et al. | Seventh Circuit | 2021-02-02 | Denied | IFP | abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure discovery-violations fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court judicial-discretion rule-37 rule-60(b)(6) rule-60b speedy-trial-act | 1. Whether discovery violations can constitute the type of extraordinary circumstances which would justify relief on the basis of fraud on the court, … |
| 19-6944 | Bahman Khodayari v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2019-12-16 | Denied | IFP | 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights damages discovery due-process nominal-damages rule-26 rule-26(a)(1)(A)(ii) rule-37 rule-37(c)(1) rule-41 rule-41(b) sanctions section-1983 | A. Does the Ninth Circuit's affirmance of the District Court's dismissal of Petitioner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(b) due to R… |
| 19-207 | David Grober, et al. v. Mako Products, Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2019-08-16 | Denied | Response Waived | burden-of-proof civil-procedure discovery due-process expense-sanctions federal-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-discretion litigation-compliance reasoned-decision rule-37 sanctions | Whether the mandatory expense sanctions of FRCP Rule 37, can be circumvented by a court ignoring, or reducing them, including to zero, absent the l… |
| 19-59 | Loop AI Labs, Inc., et al. v. Anna Gatti, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2019-07-11 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-procedure civil-sanctions due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure inherent-power national-hockey-league-v-metro-hockey-club nonmonetary-sanctions punitive-sanctions rule-37 standing | Does Nat'l Hockey League v. Metro. Hockey Club authorize a court to issue punitive nonmonetary sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) and its inhere… |
| 18-1453 | Mitra Rangarajan v. Johns Hopkins University, et al. | Fourth Circuit | 2019-05-22 | Denied | Response Waived | attorney-misconduct attorney-responsibility circuit-split civil-procedure discovery discovery-violations dismissal federal-civil-procedure federal-procedure prejudice rule-37 sanctions warning | Before this Honorable Court is the question of when it is appropriate to dismiss an action for discovery violations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, in light… |