rule-33-motion
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-1025 | Joseph Allen Maldonado-Passage v. United States | Tenth Circuit | 2026-02-26 | Pending | appellate-review brady-violation due-process prosecutorial-misconduct rule-33-motion witness-recantation | 1. Whether due process and this Court's precedents (Napue v. Illinois , Giglio v. United States , Kyles v. Whitley ) require a federal trial court to … | |
| 24-6018 | Timothy B. Fredrickson v. United States | Seventh Circuit | 2024-11-22 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | administrative-delay habeas-corpus judicial-integrity property-return rule-33-motion rule-41(g) | Whether public perception of the integrity and appearance of impartiality in the judiciary is deteriorated when, over an objection, the same judge who… |
| 22-7497 | Carlos Cantizano v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2023-05-09 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | constitutional-violation criminal-appeal due-process newly-discovered-evidence right-to-counsel rule-33 rule-33-motion rule-37 | On federal criminal appellants first appeal as of right to counsel, may the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals refuse to provide counsel to help reply to … |
| 20-722 | Rodney Anton Williamson v. United States | Fourth Circuit | 2020-11-25 | Denied | Response Waived | certificate-of-appealability conflict-of-interest habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel massiah-v-united-states right-to-counsel rule-33-motion section-2255 sixth-amendment | The right to counsel in this case was violated by the prosecution surreptitiously recording Petitioner after indictment and before arrest and arraignm… |