administrative-delay
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-6065 | Rashid El Malik v. Douglas A. Collins, Secretary of Veterans Affairs | Federal Circuit | 2025-11-07 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | administrative-delay due-process extraordinary-relief judicial-review mandamus-relief veterans-benefits | 1. Whether a catastrophically disabled veteran facing imminent, life threatening harm is entitled to mandamus relief under Martin v. O'Rourke when a g… |
| 24-6018 | Timothy B. Fredrickson v. United States | Seventh Circuit | 2024-11-22 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | administrative-delay habeas-corpus judicial-integrity property-return rule-33-motion rule-41(g) | Whether public perception of the integrity and appearance of impartiality in the judiciary is deteriorated when, over an objection, the same judge who… |
| 23A1030 | Ralph L. Hayes v. Fay Servicing, LLC | Fourth Circuit | 2024-05-20 | Presumed Complete | administrative-delay cfpb-investigation consumer-protection due-process mortgage-loans writ-of-certiorari | Question not identified. | |
| 22-5142 | David Adeyi v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs | Federal Circuit | 2022-07-20 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | administrative-delay civil-rights covid-19-disruption disability-compensation due-process federal-circuit judicial-review pandemic-disruption service-connected-injury veterans-affairs veterans-benefits | Should veteran be allowed to move his case forward, after he filled late s the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, due to the Covid-19 Pand… |
| 18-1017 | Angelex, Ltd. v. United States | District of Columbia | 2019-02-04 | Denied | 33-usc-1904 administrative-delay administrative-law apps-act-to-prevent-pollution-from-ships civil-procedure compensation-claim due-process government-liability maritime maritime-law marpol-treaty statutory-interpretation takings unreasonable-delay vessel-detention | 1. Whether the Court below erred by prematurely dismissing Angelex's case prior to trial and full presentation of Angelex's evidence; and 2. Whether … |