No. 18-1017
Angelex, Ltd. v. United States
Tags: 33-usc-1904 administrative-delay administrative-law apps-act-to-prevent-pollution-from-ships civil-procedure compensation-claim due-process government-liability maritime maritime-law marpol-treaty statutory-interpretation takings unreasonable-delay vessel-detention
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Court below erred by prematurely dismissing Angelex's case prior to trial and full presentation of Angelex's evidence; and
2. Whether the Court below erred by failing to apply the correct "reasonableness" standard in its consideration of what constitutes an "unreasonable delay of the vessel" as set forth in 33 U.S.C. § 1904(h).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court below erred in prematurely dismissing Angelex's case and failing to apply the correct 'reasonableness' standard for unreasonable delay under 33 U.S.C. § 1904(h)
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-19
Reply of petitioner Angelex, Ltd. filed.
2019-04-05
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-02-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 5, 2019.
2019-02-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2019 to April 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Angelex, Ltd.
George M. Chalos — Chalos & Co. P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent