No. 19-6944

Bahman Khodayari v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-12-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights damages discovery due-process nominal-damages rule-26 rule-26(a)(1)(A)(ii) rule-37 rule-37(c)(1) rule-41 rule-41(b) sanctions section-1983
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

A. Does the Ninth Circuit's affirmance of the District Court's dismissal of Petitioner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(b) due to Rule 37(c)(1) evidentiary sanctions for failing to disclose computation of damages under Rule 26(a)(l)(A)(iii), conflict with relevant decisions of this Court regarding Petitioner's entitlement to nominal damages?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Ninth Circuit's affirmance of the District Court's dismissal of a Petitioner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(b) due to Rule 37(c)(1) evidentiary sanctions for failing to disclose computation of damages under Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(ii), conflict with relevant decisions of this Court regarding Petitioner's entitlement to nominal damages?

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 15, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Bahman Khodayari
Bahman Khodayari — Petitioner